Jump to content

vote against bush please, i dont want to die

Guest willy.wonka

By Guest willy.wonka
in Channel Zero

Recommended Posts

S@T@N

S@T@N

Posted
Posted

I'm generally calm. I don't like to hurt people. Usually my policy is if

that people should never bring war into another person's home for any

reason. The only exception is punishment to someone who brought war

to someone else's home. So if war was ever brought to American soil...

 

I would join the military. And I would fight to my death.

 

 

I hope Bush dies a horrible death. And I hope he isn't our next term

president.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.
DankLordz

DankLordz

Posted
Posted
Originally posted by E MARTYR

what is north korea's problem again? what did we supposively do to them? someone please explain...

 

im about to sign up as a suicide bomber and go kill me some ****s.

 

 

You are a racist piece of fucking shit. I can't wait until I have an opportunity to punch you in the fucking mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Poop Man Bob

Poop Man Bob

Posted
Posted

Kabar:

 

Originally posted by KaBar2

What's going to really make it tough for Bush is that by supporting the Patriot Act, and by encouraging the Homeland Security supporters to try and get Patriot Act II (even worse) up, he is really pissing off the people that made the "razor's edge" difference that threw the last election to the Supreme Court.

 

..snip..

 

This next election is going to be a real mud bath. I may just piss my vote away and vote Libertarian. I'm sick of the Republicans yanking my dick, and Bush 43 has really mobilized the opposition with the economy and the recession/lost jobs/ NAFTA/ etc. If the Democrats would just stop trying to disarm the nation, and get rid of all the socialists pretending to be Democrats, I think they would do a lot better.

 

From here.

 

----------------

 

One libertarian's rant against Bush

 

This is a fun rant:

 

  • The administration just didn't listen to any of them, because it was determined to go ahead with its plans, regardless of facts, regardless of the truth, regardless of anything that would deter them. And they obviously didn't want the public to be fully aware of all this, because then the public might not have supported all these plans for rebuilding the world -- not if they knew the full costs, how long it would take, how many Americans might die, and that it might not work in the first place.
     
    But the administration and all these "anonymous" officials knew the truth. They had to. So now I will say what I have not said before, since at this point the evidence is incontrovertible:
     
    THEY ARE GODDAMNED LIARS. AND THEY'RE BASTARDS.
     
    Moreover, these people are an embarrassment as leaders of the United States. If it were within my power, I would fire every single one of their sorry, goddamned, disgusting asses in the next second. And they would never work in government again, even to sweep floors.
     
    These people make me sick. And they are doing incredible damage to our country, which is still the greatest country in the world. But if these people were to have their way consistently, all the way down the line, it wouldn't be for much longer.
     
    And remember this, too: if they were and are prepared to lie about all this, what else are they lying about? I suggest that you don't think about that question too long. It doesn't lead to much peace of mind.

 

The rant is not surprising. What's a Libertarian to like about the Bush administration? It has no concept of civil liberties save those embodied in the Second Amendment. Its imperialistic foreign policy has cost the country hundreds of lives and hundreds of billions in treasure (and counting!). the size of government has grown more under Bush than any recent president, including the last few Democrats. More jobs have been lost under Bush than any other president since Herbert Hoover.

 

As for fiscal sanity, how can one ignore the record deficits? But wait, Bush apologists argue, the deficits are only at record highs in absolute dollars, not in terms of percentage of GDP! See, everything is okay!

 

Given that I advocate fiscal responsibility (budgets should be balanced across the business cycle), I find that latest GOP spin ridiculous. As if half-trillion dollar deficits can ever be considered acceptable.

 

But aside from that, it's now clear that Bush's War will push the deficit into record levels -- as a percentage of the GDP:

 

  • But now, with little appetite in Congress or the White House for budget restraint, the new spending request will simply add to a deficit that could rise to $550 billion or more next year, congressional and White House estimates suggest. Measured against the size of the economy, a common way to compare deficits over time, the deficits of next year and 1992 are about the same. Both are approaching 5% of the total output of the United States, a size where economists begin to take notice.

 

So much for that "percentage of the GDP" spin.

 

I've long advocated that libertarians had to make a choice. Neither major party advocates shrinking government. God knows the Democrats never will, nor should they. Republicans pretend otherwise, but they are even more eager to increase the size of government (the better to pay off their political benefactors like Halliburton).

 

So libertarians can either vote Libertarian, or vote for the party that is less hostile to personal liberties. The Republicans are the party of the Patriot Act, John Ashcroft, and imperial conquest. And they don't trust individuals enough with the truth, so they lie and lie to hide their true agenda.

 

Dean and/or Clark would take the gun issue off the table, but yeah, Democrats would repeal the tax cut to restore fiscal sanity. Democrats would enforce environmental laws that sometimes intrude on property rights. And Democrats are more apt to try and regulate businesses for a variety of (mostly altruistic) reasons.

 

So, to libertarians, which is more harmful to your personal liberties? The Republicans who lie about their intentions and then trample on your civil liberties while growing the size of government, or Democrats? The choice is yours.

 

 

 

 

 

 

And Kabar: Dean supports leaving gun control issues up to the states.

www.deanforamerica.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites
!@#$%

!@#$%

Posted
Posted

a person, not a politician?

 

DENNIS KUCINICH: THE PROGRESSIVE CHOICE

 

"As a candidate for President, I offer a different vision for America, one which separates me from the other candidates. I am the only candidate who will take this country away from fear and war and tax giveaways, and use America's peace dividend for guaranteed health care for all, ending health care for profit. I am the only candidate who will stop the privatization of social security and bring the retirement age back to 65. As President, I will cancel NAFTA and the WTO, restore our manufacturing jobs, save our family farms, create full employment programs. I will repeal the Patriot Act to regain for all Americans the sacred right of privacy in our homes, our libraries, our schools."

 

 

 

check this guy out.

please.

 

www.kucinich.us

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nomadawhat

nomadawhat

Posted
Posted

has anybody heard of gen. wesley clark? he may be yet another democratic nominee, he says he will annouce by sept. 19th..

he seems to have good views on some issues but i have yet to hear or read much. i saw him on tv for a few minutes and he was very pesonable, plus he is what the republicans are afraid of in a nominee, someone with actual miltary credentials who is a people person.

 

some of those credentials:

 

4 star retired U.S. general

Rhodes scholar

first in his 1966 class at West Point

White House fellow,

head of the U.S. Southern Command

NATO commander during the 1999 campaign in Kosovo

 

 

keep your eye on this guy, it seems as all the other nominee's are.

 

here's a site supporting him and trying to get him to join the race for more info:

 

 

http://www.draftwesleyclark.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 years later...
H. Lecter

H. Lecter

Posted
Posted

Destroying the North Korean Government would make him a hero,

Destroying the Chinese Government would make him a saint.

 

Hawaii? Japan and South Korea would be in shambles

if Kim JongIl makes the fulfillment of his ambitions his dying wish..

There are suburbs in that region with more people than all of Hawaii.

 

I would not vote for Bush either way,

but to seek to eliminate the threat that such places pose to the stability and responsible upkeep of the world is a noble trait of a leader of any country..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Juan Fuentes

Juan Fuentes

Posted
Posted

4 out of 6 voting machine companies have straight close relations with the bush's,

do u think u can defeat a dictatorship with votes?

last elections,people voted for kerry more,u could sense it all around,who won? bush,and even if we were to get kerry,we would get the same,one man dont mess up things,they are a huge gang,with ignorant people power,themselves are all old weak and gay.

a civil war would only solve this,or a miracle...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
VANDALICIOU$$$

VANDALICIOU$$$

Posted
Posted

what a great country we live in thanks to BU$H, he diposes thousands of our troops like they're just sticks adding fuel to the fire of the pointless iraq war which continues to spread throughout the middle east that costs godamn taxpaying civilians money and for what I ask? this was never about finding weapons of "mass destruction" the war is nothing but lies/hate/violence and ignorence and stupidity of our lovely president our country is permanently fucked and will be so for generations to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...