Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Sign in to follow this  
destroya

Fuck Your Disclaimer.

Recommended Posts

taken from http://www.snopes.com

 

Claim: _ Citing "code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act" protects web site operators from prosecution.

 

Status: _ False.

 

 

Example: _ [Collected on the Internet, 2002]

If you are affiliated with any government, anti-piracy group or any other related group, or were formally a worker of one you CANNOT enter this web site, cannot access any of its files and you cannot view any of the HTML files. If you enter this site you are not agreeing to these terms and you are violating code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act signed by Bill Clinton in 1995 and that means that you CANNOT threaten our ISP(s) or any person(s) or company storing these files, and cannot prosecute any person(s) affiliated with this page which includes family, friends or individuals who run or enter this web site.

 

Origins: _ The passage quoted above, or variants thereof, can be found on thousands of web sites (particularly those that traffic in pirated software, music, and

films), placed there in the misguided belief that it actually provides web site operators protection against being prosecuted for engaging in illegal, Internet-related activities. As a legal strategem, it's just as flawed as the widely-believed notion that prostitutes and drug dealers can foil the efforts of undercover cops simply by asking them flat out "Are you a cop?" under the mistaken assumption that law enforcement officers cannot lie about their status (and if they do, the bust will be thrown out of court as a case of "entrapment").

 

As to the specifics of this dubious disclaimer, President Clinton signed no "Internet Privacy Act" in 1995, and existing federal privacy protections applicable to the world of cyberspace generally govern the collection and dissemination of personal information (such as medical records) via the Internet. Federal privacy laws don't serve to provide those who break laws in the on-line world with protection from prosecution should their illegal cyber-activities be uncovered by law enforcement officials visiting their web sites.

 

When it comes to acts that a significant portion of the public doesn't feel should be criminal (such as prostitution or distributing copyright-protected material via the Internet), many of those who engage in such acts cling to the belief that the use of some simple legal talisman -- knowing enough to ask the right question or post a pertinent disclaimer -- will immunize them from prosecutorial harm, but the law just doesn't work that way. Although we do have some well-established legal protections against the search and seizure of property and the disclosure of certain types of information (e.g., communications between priest and penitents, doctors and patients, lawyers and clients, husbands and wives) in legal proceedings, there are no special laws to prevent law enforcement officials from gathering information about illegal activities through the course of normal investigative efforts just because those efforts take place on-line, nor are the results of those efforts nullified if investigators conceal or fail to reveal their status as law enforcement officials.

 

The surest way of avoiding punishment for breaking the law remains . . . don't break the law.

 

The URL for this page is http://www.snopes.com/legal/privacy.htm

© 1995-2003

by Barbara and David P. Mikkelson

This material may not be reproduced without permission

 

Sources:

_ _ Healey, Jon. _ "Some Web Sites Are Posting a 'Keep Out' Sign to Law Enforcement."

_ _ Los Angeles Times. _ 19 November 2002 _ (p. C1).

 

*not aimed to the 12oz webmasters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well thanks for the notice.

 

I always get a big kick out of those huge email signatures

about privacy and 'being in confidence' and all that. But yeah...

 

keep it clean (your affairs and your record)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

put this on the front page of 12oz:

 

If you are under the age of 18, from Australia, or in general a dipshit, you CANNOT enter this web site, cannot access any of its files and you cannot view any of the HTML files. If you enter this site you are not agreeing to these terms and you are violating code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act signed by Bill Clinton in 1995

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Originally posted by nomadawhat

 

If you are under the age of 18, from Australia, or in general a dipshit,

 

hahaha.....perfect

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest krie
Originally posted by BigOatser

too long to read

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Originally posted by BigOatser

too long to read

Bounce over to the "four words" thread, you'd fit in there.

There are only four paragraphs, and they are not long. I counted eight periods. That means that there were as many sentences (which apparently, you do not deal in). If that is too much for you, then it is your issue. Please keep it to yourself, because as much as you don't care to read something, I would venture that everyone who frequents the boards does not care to be alerted to your ADD.

 

You need to take Focusyn.

 

"The surest way of avoiding punishment for breaking the law remains . . . don't break the law. "

^^Weak ending.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Register for a 12ozProphet forum account or sign in to comment

You need to be a forum member in order to comment. Forum accounts are separate from shop accounts.

Create an account

Register to become a 12ozProphet forum member.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×