FACTORY_MADE Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 the Bun B pic ISO 1600 24mm f2.8 1/80sec the Lupe pic ISO 1600 24mm f2.8 1/200 sec I did run Noiseware on these. I think I could have shot them at ISO 800. yeah bro whats with these ridiculous iso settings it looks like there was sufficient light if anything you couldve used the flash and tried to edit out any excess whiteness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiendish Posted June 23, 2009 Share Posted June 23, 2009 Liking them roof HDR's... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercer Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 I shoot at 1600 alot. The newer cameras with lower megapixels and larger sensors do it pretty well. Most of the photographers I shoot with got into digital in the beginning when it was unavoidable. Noise ruins pictures to me, they don't even notice it and hit 3200 on older/smaller sensors. I hate seeing it and scrap my noisy pictures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE_ARTIFACTS Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Camera: Sony DSLR-A700 Exposure: 13 Aperture: f/9.0 Focal Length: 10 mm ISO Speed: 100 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bahleediddy Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Yea bitches... I've had the v750 for almost a year now. I use the wet mount plate it comes with, which turned out to be a piece of glass encased in shitty plastic. I know theres places out there where dudes are selling higher quality homemade glass mounts for the v750, and if I remember right you may also be able to use the v700 to do wet mount scans. I find the software appealing but still a bit confusing. the curve adjustment is broken into like 6 points, when i normally will only use 2 points when doing curve adjustments. so i have to go in and uncheck all but two, which is annoying. When I was shooting 4x5 heavily and scanning all my film I wasn't the best at it(only about a year ago), but now I've got to work with some good digital production guys that have taught me alot about scanning and color corrections. And I've been using an Imacon at this job which is obviously a way greater quality scanner, and with my new, improved knowledge of scanning and such I'm excited to get back to scanning on my epson again. I was also making the mistake of trying to scan at the highest resolution possible with something like 24 bit, making my scans about 1gb. Ridiculous really. My only problem with my process is the time it takes to make a wet mount scan compared to the speed of the Imacon I use to scan this photographer dudes film. Unfortunately I haven't built a relationship with him yet for him to allow me to do my own personal scanning on his Imacon. But until then I'm happy handling original Rich and Poor and Raised By Wolves prints. In the end, good choice for an at home scanner. Decently priced for those broke like me, and moderately decent scans for a flat bed too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a/s/l? Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Picking up a 85L 1.2 II and a 70-200 f2 soon..... Anyone wanna sell a used 5d? PM if ya do, or no where I can. I really want ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_snap Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 so, we got the phot hunt thread back up and kicking again. due date for the current list is tomorrow, so doubtful any of you guys will jump on it, but you should for the next list. a year ago or so when we had that shit rollin, it was a lot of fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_snap Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 boyfriend/girlfriend possibly more to come Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEXTHYPE Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 nice photos in here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_snap Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 boyfriend/girlfriend possibly more to come no one likes getting the last post on the page Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XJONATHONX Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Not a big fan of how you edit shit. That being said, I'm about to post some shit straight out of the camera Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_snap Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 too contrasty for your liking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mn1_fuckos Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 I'm diggin the high contrast on his flicks mainly because i do it all the time also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcoFromHouston Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 yeah bro whats with these ridiculous iso settings it looks like there was sufficient light if anything you couldve used the flash and tried to edit out any excess whiteness Ridiculous?! I respectfully disagree. ISO 800 or 1600 @ 2.8 is pretty standard for concert photography in my opinion/experience/research. Many venues do not allow flash. I personally do not shoot w/flash @ concerts. if I had a 5dmark2, or a nikon d700, noise @ these settings would be reduced significantly. But, sadly, I shoot with what I can afford, which is a 30D. older/smaller sensor = more noise. lighting @ concerts varies each second, so saying "it looks like there was sufficient light" is not exactly accurate. I shoot in RAW, and more often that not I adjust the exposure & levels in post. click here for an FAQ about concert photography from a real pro: http://ishootshows.com/faq/#6 and check out my homie's concert shots & his settings. all are shot @ ISO 800 or 1600. http://www.houstonphotog.com/blog/index.php?x=browse&category=2 if anyone else shoots concerts, I would like to hear your shooting techniques. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_snap Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 iso 400 1/60 @ f4 with an sb-800 speedlight on auto same settings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loseryouthcrew Posted June 25, 2009 Share Posted June 25, 2009 some pics from when i saw limp wrist a few weeks ago... sorry about the size! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XJONATHONX Posted June 25, 2009 Share Posted June 25, 2009 I didnt attach that graff picture. I hate taking fucking portraits. So much. This dude from my work wanted pictures for his blogspot. There wasnt enough space between my pocket wizards so i had to keep the flash on camera. Did what I could. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XJONATHONX Posted June 25, 2009 Share Posted June 25, 2009 I like this one better exposure wise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nate* Posted June 25, 2009 Share Posted June 25, 2009 a couple from the island and a few from a rad trip to vernon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seph Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 This thread is fucking great, Cellphone flicks I hope I'm not ruining anything here... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mn1_fuckos Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_snap Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 really diggin the first one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbrshmonster Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 pics... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rolf Harris Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 here's a few i took yesterday, i'm only using a point and click, any pointers would be greatly appreciated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mn1_fuckos Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 Dont stop shooting! i also have a point and shoot so the more pictures you take the better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE_ARTIFACTS Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 nice set nate :cool: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mn1_fuckos Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poes Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 here's a few i took yesterday, i'm only using a point and click, any pointers would be greatly appreciated Think about composition a lot. Like in that first photo half the tree is out the shot. It would look better if the whole tree was in the shot u know? just think about everything thats gonna be in the photo and how u can best fit it in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a/s/l? Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XJONATHONX Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 Great lenses are great to have. Thats also one of the first pictures I've seen from you that I like. Good job. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.