Stupid Kid Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 that one with the bidge would look sick with a slow shutter speed and higher exposure. it looks good liek that too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gee Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 5x7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gee Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 the borders are off fuck it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyrektor Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gee Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 ^very nice shots dood! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyrektor Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Thanks man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
For Placement Only Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 this photo is awesome. Monster, teefz still gold: same bridge, different time. that one with the bidge would look sick with a slow shutter speed and higher exposure. it looks good liek that too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Issac Brock Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Slower shutter speed...longer exposure...those are the same thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Rage- Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 ^^ I was going to say that too. Ha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stupid Kid Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 huh...how are they the same, i know when the shutter stays open longer it lets in more light but you can maually change the exosure in play with the iso levels and get some nice looking light trails at nigh without it coming out grainy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EliosAVS Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 A long exposure is just the product of a slow shutter speed. When you use a higher ISO like 1600-3200 you need less light to make an exposure which means the shutter doesnt need to stay open as long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Issac Brock Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Duude...shutter speed=exposure. Iso is a different thing. edit: goes beat me. read this: http://www.morguefile.com/archive/classroom.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Rage- Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 The shutter speed controls how long the shutter stays open. The aperture (f-stop) determines how much light enters the camera via the lens. A smaller f-stop (f/16) lets in less light, creates more depth of field and requires a longer shutter speed. A larger f-stop (f/2.8) lets in more light, creates less depth of field and requires a shorter shutter speed. You can also push the ISO which would be the same as changing f-stops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stupid Kid Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 A long exposure is just the product of a slow shutter speed. When you use a higher ISO like 1600-3200 you need less light to make an exposure which means the shutter doesnt need to stay open as long. but then it gets grainy sometimes, and iso does play a role in your long exposure shots Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vivre Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 ok, well away from all the iso shit. nyrektor, your bottom shot seems like it has a contrast issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Rage- Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 ^^^ Nice fucking quote! Rock the fuck on. teefz, Well yes, the higher the ISO, the more grain you will have. The longer your shutter is open with a higher ISO, the more you are prone to noise and grain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EliosAVS Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 but then it gets grainy sometimes, and iso does play a role in your long exposure shots Yes the higher the iso the more grain you get but with a long exposure you leave your shutter open longer which means you dont need a high iso so youre not going to have a grain problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earmuffs Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earmuffs Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earmuffs Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earmuffs Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earmuffs Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbrshmonster Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 dogchap - nice pool shot. *last one is nice too fpo- nice same shot. just for the record almost every shot i posted was at 1600 iso and all the way open to 5.6 or less. shutter speed was as fast as i could get it. i would love to take a nice long exposure of that spot like fpo, but i hate carrying a tripod. so thats why i shoot extra grainy and blown out. photography is fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stupid Kid Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 omg i feel so dumb, i know what aperature is... i hve just always called it exposure wow. lol seriously thats pretty damn noobish of me nice kittin heres one i took of my girlfriends I like the 2nd to last one with the fire its sick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Issac Brock Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 If you have a decent camera, just properly expose the photo and the grain should be tasteful. the two band shots of mine up there are at 1600 iso on a 350d. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Issac Brock Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Here go a couple more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint seiya Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 my fav drink: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
For Placement Only Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 dogchap - nice pool shot. *last one is nice too fpo- nice same shot. just for the record almost every shot i posted was at 1600 iso and all the way open to 5.6 or less. shutter speed was as fast as i could get it. i would love to take a nice long exposure of that spot like fpo, but i hate carrying a tripod. so thats why i shoot extra grainy and blown out. photography is fun. yeah the shot of the bridge i think was 100 iso at 2.8f, dont know the shutter cause its a apetrue prority 35mm point and shooter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pfffffffffft Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
optimus prime Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.