Jump to content

What book are you reading right now?


Guest Canadiano

Recommended Posts

Guest --zeSto--

it's a mystery-suspence-scifi-biography (???)

 

it's set in the 1920's about this Houdini like Magician Named Carter The Great.

Now this guy really existed, so the book is about his life, but he was a mystery,

so the facts are all messed up. You dont know when it slips into fantasy.

People thought that magicians sold their souls back then... so this book

takes that idea the entire way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This forum is supported by the 12ozProphet Shop, so go buy a shirt and help support!
This forum is brought to you by the 12ozProphet Shop.
This forum is brought to you by the 12oz Shop.
  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

ummm the science of self realisation by some great guy in the hari krisna faith.

 

got it off one of those freaky guys dressed in orange dancing around and singing, he was cool.

 

alot of the stuff is totall shit but some is ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pilau Hands

One Hundred Years of Solitude - Gabriel Garcia Marquez

 

and yes...it's good. it's confusing...but very good.

 

halfway done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dyptheria

people are dissing Ishamel but no one is tripping about Atlas Shrugged...i guess that's a good indication what kind of people y'all are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Literature and Existentialism"- Jean-Paul Sartre

"Deliberate Prose"- Allen Ginsberg

 

I'm trying to find that new Keroauc book "Orpheus Emerged" but everyone round here is sold out, I'm more interested in the CD that comes with it though. Also I just finished reading "A far Rockaway Of the Heart" by Lawrence Ferlinghetti and some other Philosophy titles which include "The Age of Reason" and some other Buddhist and Taoist books.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So will "The Jungle"....

 

The Ferlinghetti title was a good read, but he's no Ginsberg, i'd give it a 2.5 out of 5..I just didn't feel the depth but you have to understand that he wasn't as concerned with strong intellectual poetry as he was with describing his childhood and past experiences in his own special way.

 

I also tend to enjoy the work of Jim Morrison from time to time.."Wilderness" is a title of his that comes to mind as being one of my favorites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

reading three just now, the first for the bus, second to go to sleep and third for expanding my brain (although i think it might melt it)

 

Demanding The Impossible - A History Of Anarchism : Peter Murray

 

Crime And Punishment : Fyodor Dostoevsky

 

The Tibetan Book Of The Dead : W.Y. Evans-Wentz

 

never been big on fiction, so my all time best book i want to recommend is 'Papillon' by Henri Charriere, the autobiography of a French convict sent to a penal colony in 1920's South America, i seriously doubt i'll ever read a beeter book, fiction or non-fiction (the film just does not compare by the way)

 

and what is this Fountainhead book? something about architecture?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dyptheria

Ayn Rand is adored by capitalists because of her moral justification of selfishness and philosophical promotion of rugged individualism. She detests socialism and any ideology of coerced collectivity. She believes in progress through the free-enterprise system.

 

In Ishmael the character divides humans in two categories he calls "Takers" and "Leavers" who correspond roughly with what we call "civilized world" and "developing countries". To explain this division he goes back to the beginnings of agriculture, when the foundation for our present day civilization was laid. It's no secret that the attempts to subdue the Earth weren't all that civilized. But most people aren't aware of the effect this process can have on an outsider. It takes a gorilla to point our attention towards all the little oddities we like to take for granted. Its a book for people who always doubted that man is the crown of creation...or recommended reading for those who still believe that we are the top and nothing can possibly come after us.

 

With my education, I understand the global catastrophe coming upon us, which is why i identify with Quinn more thjan rand. Some one else made a thread on here about Earth in 50 years. Read that.

 

Rand supports the capitalist/consumerist philosophy, while Quinn supports raises the concept of conservation.

 

Sure, as someone poointed out, a lot of "lost" hippie/new age types identify with Quinn. they may be stupid, but Quinn just put knowledge that needs to be known into a palatable form in order for common people to understand. I work in Geoscience, and i see the data first hand that indicates we're headed for turmoil in the first world. If Ishamel isn't convincing, take a year of college chemistry, and a course in biogeochemical cycles and you yourself will be convinced of this line of thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"and what is this Fountainhead book? something about architecture?"

 

 

fountainhead is a book you should read, and as far as this layman goes it centers around architecture.......im sure its not all techie for an expert but i learned some shit....

 

im reading, "before philosophy" and its a fucking bitch....but i love it....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Canadiano

Why Quinn, though? i'm not gonna get into a well-written and thought out critique of the guy, but I really, really didn't like what he had to say. I'm all for conservation, and there are some great books out there regarding that stuff.

Quinn, it seems to me, is extremely naive when he denounces agriculture. He thinks the advent of the division/distribution of labour was a bad thing. My intelligent response? "FUCK THAT!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dyptheria

see, i haven't read too far into the book. i agree as well, that agriculture and the division of labor is probobly one of the greatest revolutions of humanity. i'm all for embracing technology to make our living more efficient. i wasn't that that was Quinns stance. But as far as Ayn Rand goes, she can suck a fat dick. She is totally overrated. The second someone cites her, i usually dismiss them as someone who's easily impressed by psuedo-intellectualism.

 

Since you like Nonfiction, check out Human Impact on Ancient Environments by Charles Redman. A compelling book, just a straight scientific view on human effects throughout time, no irrational radical conservationist propaganda. Unlike Quinn, the author doesn't believe we can just turn back to pre agricultural ways (which is what i gather from your explaination)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The second someone cites her, i usually dismiss them as someone who's impressed by anything psuedo intellectual."

 

 

for somone so philosophical, that sure is a close minded statement....keep on truckin' i guess....

 

 

the second someone comes across holier then thou, i usually just dont pay attention anymore........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dyptheria

see, people like us here usually haven't read up on other views, which is why i don't take Rand followers seriously. It reminds me of religious people who believe in one religion that they were introduced to without bothering to investigate other lines of thought. I have indeed read atlas shrugged and I don't like it for various reasons. Rand manipulates the conventions of fiction in order to make her political philosophy seem compelling and plausible. This is most obvious when she must invent a utopia--an actual physical place, located in the Rockies and protected by a space-age force field--where only the best and the brightest have dedicated their lives to perfecting their inventions. The place is utterly unreal. The movers and shakers who live there are more like cardboard cutouts of late-19th Century capitalists than real flesh and blood human beings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Canadiano
Originally posted by Dyptheria

see, i haven't read too far into the book. i agree as well, that agriculture and the division of labor is probobly one of the greatest revolutions of humanity. i'm all for embracing technology to make our living more efficient. i wasn't that that was Quinns stance. But as far as Ayn Rand goes, she can suck a fat dick. She is totally overrated. The second someone cites her, i usually dismiss them as someone who's easily impressed by psuedo-intellectualism.

 

Since you like Nonfiction, check out Human Impact on Ancient Environments by Charles Redman. A compelling book, just a straight scientific view on human effects throughout time, no irrational radical conservationist propaganda. Unlike Quinn, the author doesn't believe we can just turn back to pre agricultural ways (which is what i gather from your explaination)

 

I'll try and see if I can get that book. Is it easily attainable, you think? Sounds good.

I'm not too sure whether that is exactly what Quinn said, but it was something along those lines. Plus, he has a lot of hair brained theories regarding mankind's past. It's been a few years since I read that garbage, but I remember laughing a lot. Plus, these guys that I thought were my friends absolutely loved him...you should see where they are now, as they are most probably entering the final stages of their hippie, vegan cheerleading, flag burning, rolling all problems into a ball phase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...