I really do like it when people push the boundaries and take things a step further than where people are comfortable.
Even if you look back through the timeline of popular graffiti you catch glimpses of someone pushing the limits of what
letters can be, and then there becomes a paradigm shift. I give props to a lot of the writers in this thread for doing shit
that I'm sure everyone around them thought was weird at first and their crews were probably like, "Come on dog, you're
falling off, shit is wack.." But they kept at it and created major innovation.
However, some of these people think they are being MUCH more creative and innovative than they are. Guys, go take
one look at cubism, then Mondrian, then early ab-ex painting, and then tell me this shit is new and creative? I echo the
calls that too many writers lost the vocabulary of letterforms, because really what makes the innovators innovative is operating
inside of the structures of letters. It's easy to just paint lines and colors and make it look intriguing and interesting, but
it is NOT fresh, exciting or new. What makes it exciting is to blend the forms of graffiti with abstraction, or as it's been
labeled "futurism" (thanks Futura!).
Too many of the writers in this thread are just using corny overused graphic design cliches and translating them into
spray-paint. Too many people are doing poorly contemplated geometric abstractions in CMYK and think they are taking shit
"to the next level." Yeah, we all know CMYK looks good, cool, very flat basic colors, very aesthetically pleasing, your making
my rods and cones vibrate... But it isn't innovative.
I applaud everyone who takes more than three seconds to come up with new and astounding color combinations, those that
continue to bend the forms of letters into something amazing but yet grounded in the culture that we all are so invested in.
Anyway, here's my little dissertation. Hope you like it. Haha.