vaybur

Seriously... I got tickets to see Atmosophere in chicago on friday may 12th @ the vic theater(sold out), I got them as a gift and I'm flying in to see them from the west coast but some of the people in the group can't make the trip now. I have atleast 1 and up to 3 tickets and I hate it when people try and slang tickets to underground shows, so they're free I'll take the loss. I beleive that 12oz. has a private messaging system, hit me up if you want them.

I think Moussaoui is bad guy but he claimed credit for everything ever done in a form of terrorism. I think he planned to try and attack the US in some way, but I seriously doubt this guy had anything to do with 9/11. Too much gusto on his part

I wasn't really concerned about this because most gangs aren't really brutal in nature, they are orginizations that are know if wide spread violence breaks out they have to fight two enemies so they really don't have all out wars. That said sur-13 are crazy and the fact some of them are getting american military training actually scares me, they idea of violence and the justifications for it far surpass the ruthlessness of any other gang in recent times. They already have paramilitary influence and I really think they will become a larger problem in the United States and Central America.

I can only assume I don't get your first sentence because the sarcasm key has yet to be invented but I don't understand how your solution could work in reality. How do we pick out illegal immigrants? Do we just round up everyone brown or do you make all Hispanics where some sort of scarlet letter? What about my state where many of the illegal immigrants are from China, India, Canada, etc... Do they get a free pass? So you're solution is to what, cut illegal immigrants off from society? Good because the best thing for an impoverished minority group in the USA is for their children to grow up illiterate and have no useful skills, awesome. So you want to end public schooling, Medicare, all civil service jobs, to get the constitution back to its original spending pattern? Wasn't it supposed to be a fluid constitution, that's why we can amend it? If we did everything as the constitution said we wouldn't have to worry about Mexicans becoming citizens because they wouldn't even be people, but I guess that's how it already is for you.

I would go for the decriminalization on the grounds of limiting the number of "small fish" in the system but I can't imagine that a country rampant with large drug cartels really spends a lot of money on weekend warriors. This is just retarded

Although I respect the show of knowledge. Sallinger was already a member of the administration at that point, working under the directive of RFK, Yo. If you really want to talk about amatuer papers and journalism degree's myers follows that line and is more recent. Edit:<Sp>

Following the resignation of Scott McClellan as White house press secretary(the guy that has answer questions for the white house), the white house has turned to the most logical choice to tell the president's side of the story...A current fox news "analyst". Tony Snow is currently host of a self-titled talk show on the Fox News network. According to foxnews.com, who had their own Bill O'reilly interview their own(?) Tony Snow about the possibilities of Snow accepting the position during an interview that was conducted on his current employers TV stations. Hmmm.... I'm sure this matters very little cool hunters that accidentally click this section on their way to look at other shit but seriously, this shit is wrong on so many levels. This guy is a "news reporter" and now he's the guy responsible to tell the country what the president really means. This guy was an editor at the Washington Post during the Reagan and HW years, how does this pass as journalism. I know this means little to the masses on this site but I'll try to bring so reality, the actual sad avoidance of reality in America today to this board.

I can't seem to find one that does, out of the last 900+ peer reviewed studies on global warming, not one debates the fact that it is happening. The only people that you see that debate whether or not it is actually taking place are on TV or the internet...and both are always right

1. The war within Islam is not that involves territory, giving sunni's and shite's land and expecting everything to work out is just adding fuel to a fire. The Syrian state will not allow for the creation of a Kurdistan, They will use force. For everything to go better in the middle east land can't be "carved out". That would create another Africa with tribal and country lines crosssecting and creating more problems. The Islamic world needs time to evolve, it's been out of the spotlight for a couple of centuries. It's been along time since it had power and now to rule the world you need more than horses and sheer force to rule the world, you need multinational corporations. 2. The answers aren't going to standardized test style, no choosing C. The solutions won't be created by the people you see on TV or in the News. They will be made by small officials you've never heard of. Anyone that tells you they know the solution...doesn't. Even Me