Jump to content

SOAKER

Banned
  • Posts

    2,626
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SOAKER

  1. hahah I hear that... what was that like fucking over a decade ago? Who the fuck is this guy yungun? talkin mad shit about some trivial beef from over a decade ago? What the fuck does he have to show fo it...lame

  2. Yea well the bureaucrats in Washington don't worry about what the people want, they know whats best and set their own agenda, based on what ever corrupt ass bullshit they have going on. More taxes, more control. What they need to do is cut the cost of medical care. I sure as well would like insurance to be cheaper and medical care not cost so damn much but not at the cost of raising taxes and making insurance mandatory, punishable with fines. We already pay social security and medicare, why would they impose more taxes if we already have a mandatory medical related tax? So were going to create more taxes and waste more money and fund all kinds of shit that we don't need. The government can't be all things to all people all over the fucking world. Hopefully they amend the bill and make some changes, especially the part about fines.

  3. HA! I just saw one of those stores down the street. For the whole year they had this going out of business sales, then yesterday they had some grand opening event...

     

    Add Guantanamo to the list of "executive orders" that have been broken.

     

    Good summation AOD. The government is delusional, thinking that they are in control of the economy, the drug trade, and even other nations. In his interview Obama suggested how he was to credit for the economic recovery, which is a complete lie, and that job growth will pick up because of the great job he is doing. Basically patting himself on the back fo shit that is not happening. Sadly there are those that believe this guys propaganda...

  4. AOD sentiments to not echo the views of a media empire. These fears and views are based on protecting the constitutional freedoms we possess. And they are very real, not preconceived notions. When we won the war with Britain we established these rights to protect our individual freedoms, and Bush and Obama have slowly chipped away at them. Lets remember something here, Bush did not start a war. Congress must give authorization for this to happen, and thats what took place. And the war in Afghanistan had EVERY member of congress back it, to include Obama. The president has limited executive power, which in just about every case can be overridden by Congress, so it's not as if he just wages war like the dictators of so many nations in this world.

     

    Obama campaigned on refocusing the war to Afghanistan. The war on drugs is not just a domestic issue, and as a matter of fact several DEA agents were just killed in Afghanistan of all places. Talk about imperialism. I don't think AOD is suggesting that Obama just do these things with the snap of a finger, nor do I think he is in favor of these things. Rather he is pointing out that Obama campaigned on these issues, and the notion of change. Yet he has not made these changes and apparently conservatives are not the only ones that are becoming increasingly skeptical of this guy and lack of integrity. I was somewhat impressed with the interview Obama did with Major Garrett from Fox News. He danced around the issues as could be expected, but he seemed to be honest.

  5. i watched a youtube video of him campaigning last week where he said he was going to 'bring all the troops home!' to cheers and shouts.

    he pulled troops out of iraq, put them in 'stan and replaced all the troops he pulled out with contractors. that is not bringing anyone home. unless you are a politician.

     

    i still stand by what i said 100% if he wanted to, he could do ALOT. he has it within his capacity to bring the troops home NOW. he can basically render the patriot act and other things like that null and void by refusing to enforce them.

     

    i do give him some respect for pulling the DEA off of medical marijuana facilities, but we'll see what really happens with all this. he could cease the entire war on drugs if he wanted to. as andrew jackson said in response to a supreme court ruling...'well he has made his decision, now let them enforce it.'

     

    these are the only things i could possibly find common ground with the guy on, and he is no different than bush on the war. so i really dont have common ground with him on anything. his socialism, class warfare rhetoric and policies, anti gun stance.. are all hideous and trample what little liberty americans have left.

     

     

    AMEN TO THAT!!

  6. agreed. I seen red in some VA pics if I'm not mistaken. But those letters are basic, if not generic and to suggest that the e, of all letters is SIME, is just ridiculous. Sounds like someone is politely hating.

  7. Once again, the last several posts spoke to the political aspect of this issue, so WTF are talking about? To discuss the politics and falacies of the propaganda requires delving into the science. At no point did I point to science being the basis for my argument. As you've suggested you disgree with my opinion, but that is all you've said. Everything you've said is baseless and has just been an attempt to discredit my opinion without actually backing what you've said. As a matter of fact you're the one that brought up science by claiming you've been bestowed with this knowledge by osmosis. Actually reading and researching different sides to an issue from credible sources carries more weight than talking to few people at a school

     

    But, I digress. It seems your ability to objectively view this discussion or to see the failure of your logic has won. The fear mongering and politicization of environmentalism has also won you over. The trampling of our freedoms seems not to concern you.

  8. Grad students, professors, and NASA JPL scientists. Go back and read.

     

    I'm also lumping Phd's and post-docs in the "grad student" category. But who cares, open-minded discussion with students > narrow-minded internet research.

     

    Reiterating what you said and changing it is no different than me editing a post of mine, which you arrogantly suggested was hypocritical. Personally I don't care if you were endowed with some infinite wisdom from god. You still have failed to provide anything that is substantial to back your opinion. Just implying that you spoke with someone and they told you you were right does not make it so. The fact that you KEEP coming back to this point is becoming annoyingly redundant. Taking my statements out of context is not helping you prove any point either. If you haven't noticed the subject has shifted slightly back to what the thread was intended for. the Obama administration and the similarities between the Bush administration. If you read one of the last statements I made in response to you I appealed to your argument that there was the possibility for political corruption with this issue. It seems strange that you would accept the opinion of some students or professors (as if your really going around some campus that your not a member of and interviewing all of these professors about this issue). The fact is that there a great deal of professors, scientists, PHD's or what have you, that contest the theory of global warming. Providing evidence based on college articles, or books, etc that are written by Phd's and post-docs in the "grad student" is not narrow minded. How could you suggest it to be so when you supposed opinion is based off of similar sources.

×
×
  • Create New...