SOAKER

INTERNET BEEF! Its serious fucking business people.

he's a homosexualologist

Go fuck yer nuanced self ya neo-liberal fascist wind bag

hahah I hear that... what was that like fucking over a decade ago? Who the fuck is this guy yungun? talkin mad shit about some trivial beef from over a decade ago? What the fuck does he have to show fo it...lame

haha...oh damn... that DERK is fesh...them rollers...SCUM is an animal!

your a dumb ass thats not even a style...thats just some fucking drips and shit...how the fuck you gonna bite some drips and bubbles...

haha...that burner is nice...benched that GOES NOSEY car the other day...

had ta bump these up to the next page...

Ehhhhh that AREK is slick! The production looks good and that RYKE! nice...

Yea well the bureaucrats in Washington don't worry about what the people want, they know whats best and set their own agenda, based on what ever corrupt ass bullshit they have going on. More taxes, more control. What they need to do is cut the cost of medical care. I sure as well would like insurance to be cheaper and medical care not cost so damn much but not at the cost of raising taxes and making insurance mandatory, punishable with fines. We already pay social security and medicare, why would they impose more taxes if we already have a mandatory medical related tax? So were going to create more taxes and waste more money and fund all kinds of shit that we don't need. The government can't be all things to all people all over the fucking world. Hopefully they amend the bill and make some changes, especially the part about fines.

damn VOSE letters looking proper...sick

Eyyyoooo that skull is sick DRIPS...you did that? Damn this wall is sick...King status right here Anyone know who did the old 86 joint?

Damn ELI puttin in work...bump LATER Music City

HA! I just saw one of those stores down the street. For the whole year they had this going out of business sales, then yesterday they had some grand opening event... Add Guantanamo to the list of "executive orders" that have been broken. Good summation AOD. The government is delusional, thinking that they are in control of the economy, the drug trade, and even other nations. In his interview Obama suggested how he was to credit for the economic recovery, which is a complete lie, and that job growth will pick up because of the great job he is doing. Basically patting himself on the back fo shit that is not happening. Sadly there are those that believe this guys propaganda...

AOD sentiments to not echo the views of a media empire. These fears and views are based on protecting the constitutional freedoms we possess. And they are very real, not preconceived notions. When we won the war with Britain we established these rights to protect our individual freedoms, and Bush and Obama have slowly chipped away at them. Lets remember something here, Bush did not start a war. Congress must give authorization for this to happen, and thats what took place. And the war in Afghanistan had EVERY member of congress back it, to include Obama. The president has limited executive power, which in just about every case can be overridden by Congress, so it's not as if he just wages war like the dictators of so many nations in this world. Obama campaigned on refocusing the war to Afghanistan. The war on drugs is not just a domestic issue, and as a matter of fact several DEA agents were just killed in Afghanistan of all places. Talk about imperialism. I don't think AOD is suggesting that Obama just do these things with the snap of a finger, nor do I think he is in favor of these things. Rather he is pointing out that Obama campaigned on these issues, and the notion of change. Yet he has not made these changes and apparently conservatives are not the only ones that are becoming increasingly skeptical of this guy and lack of integrity. I was somewhat impressed with the interview Obama did with Major Garrett from Fox News. He danced around the issues as could be expected, but he seemed to be honest.

AMEN TO THAT!!

agreed. I seen red in some VA pics if I'm not mistaken. But those letters are basic, if not generic and to suggest that the e, of all letters is SIME, is just ridiculous. Sounds like someone is politely hating.

Once again, the last several posts spoke to the political aspect of this issue, so WTF are talking about? To discuss the politics and falacies of the propaganda requires delving into the science. At no point did I point to science being the basis for my argument. As you've suggested you disgree with my opinion, but that is all you've said. Everything you've said is baseless and has just been an attempt to discredit my opinion without actually backing what you've said. As a matter of fact you're the one that brought up science by claiming you've been bestowed with this knowledge by osmosis. Actually reading and researching different sides to an issue from credible sources carries more weight than talking to few people at a school But, I digress. It seems your ability to objectively view this discussion or to see the failure of your logic has won. The fear mongering and politicization of environmentalism has also won you over. The trampling of our freedoms seems not to concern you.

Reiterating what you said and changing it is no different than me editing a post of mine, which you arrogantly suggested was hypocritical. Personally I don't care if you were endowed with some infinite wisdom from god. You still have failed to provide anything that is substantial to back your opinion. Just implying that you spoke with someone and they told you you were right does not make it so. The fact that you KEEP coming back to this point is becoming annoyingly redundant. Taking my statements out of context is not helping you prove any point either. If you haven't noticed the subject has shifted slightly back to what the thread was intended for. the Obama administration and the similarities between the Bush administration. If you read one of the last statements I made in response to you I appealed to your argument that there was the possibility for political corruption with this issue. It seems strange that you would accept the opinion of some students or professors (as if your really going around some campus that your not a member of and interviewing all of these professors about this issue). The fact is that there a great deal of professors, scientists, PHD's or what have you, that contest the theory of global warming. Providing evidence based on college articles, or books, etc that are written by Phd's and post-docs in the "grad student" is not narrow minded. How could you suggest it to be so when you supposed opinion is based off of similar sources.