By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at [email protected] and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!

Why drugs and terrorism mix

Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by Grandola, Jul 23, 2002.

  1. Grandola

    Grandola Senior Member

    Joined: Jul 16, 2002 Messages: 1,773 Likes Received: 0
    off of marijuana.com:

    Contrast: Why drugs and terrorism mix
    =>Posted by: KWhite.
    =>Monday, July 22 @ 00:41:43 MST
    The Ottawa Citizen
    Date: Thursday, July 18, 2002

    After Sept. 11, drug cops around the world raced to recast themselves as central players in the war on terrorism. "Narco-terrorism," a hitherto almost unknown phrase, started popping up everywhere.

    For instance, Narco-terrorism and Canada, a confidential RCMP report produced in November, 2001, said Afghan hashish imported to Canada generates about $20 million U.S., a portion of which "likely" goes to "terrorist elements in Afghanistan." The RCMP wants the readers to conclude that "You can't fight terrorism without fighting drugs," as the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration has become fond of saying.

    This conclusion would not protect us from drugs (or terror) any better than prohibition has in the past 80 years. But it would safeguard the RCMP's budget, and the jobs of 1,000 Mounties working full-time on drugs.

    It is true, as another RCMP report states, that "narcotics have long been used by organized crime and extremist/terrorist groups as a means to generate revenues to support armed conflict." But any serious analysis would ask why. Why do the fanatics of the world zero in on the drug trade, instead of smuggling liquor or coffee, sugar or chocolate bon-bons?

    It's because drugs are illegal. Why smuggle a legal product to get the same modest profit legal sellers do? Because drugs are illegal, producers, wholesalers and retailers only get involved if there's a huge "risk premium" added to the price. So illegal drugs have fantastic profit margins, making them ideal revenue sources for gangsters, guerrillas or terrorists.

    If economic theory is unconvincing, try history. Until drugs were criminalized in the early 20th century, they were made by major pharmaceutical companies such as Merck and sold in ordinary stores, with no criminals or terrorists involved. That changed once drugs were banned.

    Gangsters got rich, and killers with political ambitions quickly saw what uses could be made of the new illicit trade. In the 1920s, Soviet officials sold drugs in the Far East. In 1931, a secret society of Japanese officers used drug-smuggling profits to fund an attack on a Japanese-run railway in Manchuria, as the pretext for the Japanese invasion. In 1933, U.S. investigators found Honduran citizens diverting European narcotics from the legal trade and selling them in the U.S. "for arms and ammunition which were being sent for use in revolution."

    Drugs don't enrich thugs; the criminal law does. RCMP bosses know it. They should look beyond self-interest, and be honest about what is really putting cash in terrorists' pockets.


    word to the mommy fucker
  2. sneak

    sneak Guest

    wow, who wuda guesssed drugs were linked to terrorists????:rolleyes:
  3. --zeSto--

    --zeSto-- Guest

    3 words...

    The Opium War

    governments have allways been the biggest pushers.
  4. ledzep

    ledzep Junior Member

    Joined: Feb 21, 2002 Messages: 146 Likes Received: 1
    you are amazing.
    :jazz clap:
  5. asianf50

    asianf50 New Jack

    Joined: Mar 20, 2002 Messages: 21 Likes Received: 0
    thats bullshit!!! terrorists get there money from the government. they send moeny to this third world countries for food and stuff. but the government in these third world countries dont give a shit about there ppl. they take the moeny to buy missle and guns and shit and send tere ppl here to spy on the american government. drug money goes tot he drug dealers, i dont think they give money to charaties and third world countires.
  6. greedy mars

    greedy mars Guest

    i dont give a shit. were all gonna die. let me ride and smoke dunny.. woop
  7. Grandola

    Grandola Senior Member

    Joined: Jul 16, 2002 Messages: 1,773 Likes Received: 0
    s'all i was tring to get across...
  8. Esai

    Esai Member

    Joined: Oct 12, 2001 Messages: 612 Likes Received: 1
    Actually the Us gave the taliban over 200 milion up till the 911 bombing. The Us also was the major player in the smuggling of tons of coke into the US in the 80's to fund the contras, basically destroying most of americas poor neighborhoods.
  9. rip

    rip Elite Member

    Joined: Nov 10, 2001 Messages: 2,667 Likes Received: 0
    ummm according to the comercials if u buy drugs your supporting terrorist. does any else have a problem with this? me neither ::bong rip::
  10. B_As_In_Bot

    B_As_In_Bot Elite Member

    Joined: Sep 7, 2000 Messages: 3,840 Likes Received: 11