Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at info@12ozprophet.com and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!

What women want 2!

Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by WebsterUno, Dec 26, 2001.

  1. WebsterUno

    WebsterUno Guest

    Ok, I just read what Secret posted.
    A girl I know wants to do that too! When I first met her, she asked me
    what I thought of her posing nude. She said she would like it to be in
    Playboy, cuz it is more classy. I said it was all the same thing, trashy. If
    I flicked my potna all bucked nekked in the woods, would that be tatseful.
    Fuck naw, it would be a picture of my homeboy, BUCKED NEKKED, in the
    muthafuckin woods, smokin a blunt. This guy is blacker than a muthahfucka
    too. With that said, Secret, crack open the Henn-Doggy-Dogg, we having a
    us a photosession. Call me Olan Webster. ;)

    Hustler/Playboy, its all the same thing.
    Nekked pix.
     
  2. WebsterUno

    WebsterUno Guest

    *believe*

    Oh yeah, what do you guys think?
    Is it the same, or is it different?
    Also, would you let YOUR lady do it?
    Would any of you ladies do it?

    You got the Henny, I got the bomb!
     
  3. dBUSH

    dBUSH Member

    Joined: Apr 17, 2000 Messages: 950 Likes Received: 1
    I'm a photographer- I'd love for my girl to let me take her picture. I'd have to be pretty contented with my woman to let another man photograph her though.
     
  4. WebsterUno

    WebsterUno Guest

    *believe*

    Well, the arguement was, Playboy is just the
    same as Hustler. Either way you look at it, its
    still nekked pictures. Be it a shoot in the woods,
    or a shoot in the alley way.
     
  5. dBUSH

    dBUSH Member

    Joined: Apr 17, 2000 Messages: 950 Likes Received: 1
    yeah, hustler flicks are way freakier than Playboy- I'd let my girl pose for Playboy under 3 conditions (not between my girl and playboy, me and playboy but between me and my girl):
    1. the photo session in a closed set
    2. no male models under any circumstance
    3. I am present for all naked photo-taking

    I don't agree that all naked pictures are trashy though. I've taken tasteful pictures, and I've taken trashy ones.;)
     
  6. dBUSH

    dBUSH Member

    Joined: Apr 17, 2000 Messages: 950 Likes Received: 1
    haha... I'm just not the freak you are teaser.
     
  7. WebsterUno

    WebsterUno Guest

    *bling bling*

    Tease is the biggest freak on here.
    A True Panty Raider.
    Young, Dumb, and full of CUM.
    No offense Tease.
     
  8. Secret

    Secret Elite Member

    Joined: Apr 20, 2000 Messages: 3,169 Likes Received: 0
    Haha, oh dear... well as for the whole picture concept, I actually think there's a big difference between Playboy and Hustler. Playboy isn't as graphic, and Hustler is more pornographic. I don't think ALL naked pictures are trashy. Take art history for example... back in whatever ages (sorry I didn't pay attention in class) they painted tons of naked girls/guys and I don't see it as sexual at all. But if the girl was lying down with her legs wide open touching herself while making odd faces at you... that's a different story.

    I didn't mean for the whole picture thing to be a big deal. I just think it would be cool to show my husband (whoever he might be) what I looked like when I was young. I'd even like to look back at myself sometime in the future. Just the way you like to look at baby pictures of yourself... this is sort of the same idea, but a lot more fun.

    One thing I never agreed on with boyfriends or whoever is naked pictures and videos. If they want to remember me, then they can just leave that up to the imagination.

    ;)
     
  9. Are2

    Are2 Guest

    i know what you mean, secret..

    i'll be old and wrinkled one day..and i don't want to forget what i looked like when i was still hot..
    i don't ever want to be published though

    objectifying women's bodies is ok for everyone who is into it, models and voyeurs included, i guess all that attention isn't for me

    i'd love to have a man who loves me so much he wants me ..and me alone..regardless..and have a man i love so much that i want to stay fit and sexy for him for as long as i can (without surgery)
     
  10. bobobi11

    bobobi11 Elite Member

    Joined: Dec 15, 2000 Messages: 2,807 Likes Received: 0
    I'm with Secret. I think it would be cool to have pictures for my own personal viewing, but I wouldn't do the porn bit. I wish I had had pictures taken before I had kids, but alas, I am just stuck with the memories.

    As for Playboy and Hustler. These days Playboy is all about the articles with weak layouts that are few and far between. The layouts are much classier however. Penthouse is in the same league.

    Then you have Hustler and Gallery, etc. These are more about the serious porn with multiple person shots, extremely raunchy situations and just that much more trashy. Makes it great for viewing, wouldn't ever want to be a part of it. These are actually getting raunchier with full penetration and fetishes.

    Last, but not least there are the "Dirty" magazines that cater to the true pervert with magazines based on fetishes, hardcore, and just plain f***ing.

    And yes there are other levels, but it's early and I am not going to name them all.
     
  11. Some1

    Some1 12oz Loyalist

    Joined: Oct 13, 2001 Messages: 14,835 Likes Received: 92
    I WANT TO SEE SOME NEKKED WOMEN UP IN THIS POST YA HEA!
     
  12. MR BOJANGLES

    MR BOJANGLES Guest

    being a fan of both raunchy porn and tasteful nudes, id say theres a biiiiig difference playboy shows a woman for her shape, style, and beauty in backgrounds that compliment her personal look. hustler (which i love too) has chicks with dildos layin around them and four chicks groping eachother. different but good either way. LETS GET NEKKID!!!
     
  13. WebsterUno

    WebsterUno Guest

    *believe*

    Ok, ok, my bad. I should rephrase
    my earlier comments. I didnt mean to call
    you (Secret) trashy. I was having this
    discussion with some GFs of mine, and
    they said they would do it too. One was
    saying that she wanted to be in a mag,
    or start stripping in a more upscale club.
    I argued that either way, its still showing
    off your body to a world of perverts. Taking
    artsy pix is much better. If it was my girl, I
    wouldnt mind, if I was doing the pic taking.
    I can see what youre saying ladies, if its
    personal, cool. But showing your body to
    millions of people, to me, is questionable,
    if it was my girl. I dont think I would give
    ANYONE pix of myself nekked, look what
    happened to KAMIKAZI! LOL :)
     
  14. Some1

    Some1 12oz Loyalist

    Joined: Oct 13, 2001 Messages: 14,835 Likes Received: 92
    I know how to make it artsy get her naked and paint her and then get her with like 2 other girls and lettem go at it. eh?eh? now thats artsy
     
Top