By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at [email protected] and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!

The Ring 2

Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by fermentor666, Mar 17, 2005.

  1. fermentor666

    fermentor666 Veteran Member

    Joined: Sep 27, 2003 Messages: 8,152 Likes Received: 15
    Ok, most of us saw the Ring and liked it, I thought it was a great little horror film. I got passes to an advanced screening last night and went to see it. Here's the spoiler-free IMDB synopsis:

    ""The Ring 2" picks up six months after the horrifying events that terrorized Rachel Keller (Naomi Watts) and her son Aidan (David Dorfman) in Seattle. To escape her haunting memories, Rachel takes Aidan and moves to the small coastal community of Astoria, Oregon, to start fresh. However, Rachel's resolve quickly turns to dread when evidence at a local crime scene - including an unmarked videotape - seems eerily familiar. Rachel realizes that the vengeful Samara is back and more determined than ever to continue her relentless cycle of terror and death."

    This is the only picture I could find:


    Part with spoilers:

    Notice the date says November 2004 (edit: the first picture did, but it didn't show up)? That's because the film was supposed to come out then but they decided to reshoot a bunch of scenes. This is generally a bad omen in Hollywood-land, when a film needs to reshoot scenes, it's usually because it tests badly or the producers aren't happy with the final results or both.

    The film starts off the same as the first one, two teenagers are talking about the tape, but this time it seems like it's common knowledge that the tape needs to be copied and given to someone to watch before the 7 days are up in order for the person who watched it to live. A teenage boy is tries to get a girl to watch the tape before his time is up, but isn't so lucky.

    In the first film, the back-story to how the two girls in the beginning got ahold of the tape is shown, and is an important part of the plotline. The major problem with the Ring 2 is that it doesn't bother with any of this. We see Samara's real mother (Sissy Spacek) in a mental institution, and rather than give answers or even half-answers as to what Samara is, who her father was, why she says Samara is dead, etc, all we get is a bunch of hooey about having to kill the girl to be a "good mother".

    There's no explenation about how the tape got from Seattle to Naomi Watts' new small town other than "Samara wants to get her" or whatever.

    The main plotline is that Samara takes Watts' kid in the film and makes him kill a couple of people and not sleep. Watts spends the first half of the film trying to figure out why Samara is back, and the second half of the film trying to figure out how to stop her from taking over her kid.

    And that's about it, just about none of the great cinematography and ambience of the first film is present. All of the scenes seem pretty shallow, and almost all of the scares in the film had people laughing afterwards instead of like the first film when everyone left afraid to answer their cell phone.

    Part of this can be explained by the idea of the film no longer being new. But mostly it's because this movie is just like every other horror film sequal. It has no depth and treats the viewer like an idiot.

    I wouldn't waste your money on it this weekend unless you're fanatical about the Ring 2. Wait for DVD or download it.
  2. saraday

    saraday Senior Member

    Joined: Nov 29, 2004 Messages: 2,054 Likes Received: 1
    is it directed by the same person as the first one?
  3. !@#$%

    [email protected]#$% Moderator Crew

    Joined: Oct 1, 2002 Messages: 18,517 Likes Received: 623

    i KNEW they were gonna ruin it.
    the previews look like warmed up asssjuice.
  4. fermentor666

    fermentor666 Veteran Member

    Joined: Sep 27, 2003 Messages: 8,152 Likes Received: 15
    The first one was directed by Gore Verbinski and written by Ehren Kruger (who did Arlington Road, but also did Scream 3). This one is directed by Hideo Nakata, who did the Japanese films that these were based on, and written by Hiroshi Takahashi, who wrote the original Japanese films. I think that's part of the problem, the american Ring was a western film, and despite the fact that Ringu was a good film on it's own, it doesn't fit very well with The Ring even though the storylines are similar. This plays like a bad Japanese horror film, instead of being a worthy sequal to the American film.

    Really, they shouldn't have even bothered making this with such a sub-par storyline. Granted some of the effects were cool, there's one scene in a bathtub where water is falling upwards, hard to explain but very cool, and there were a few good scares, but it was really just stupid, played like a stalker flick. It was just a couple of steps removed from the cheese of Darkness Falls. Not as bad as that film, though. Like I said, a rental at best and that's if you're into horror films. There's nothing new in this one. And they don't even show the full tape. If this were it's own film, not a sequel, it would be terrible.
  5. willy.wonka

    willy.wonka Guest

    i didnt really like the first one.. i just liked the trippy black and white film. sure the first one had its little quirks and all, but it didnt do anyhting for me

    everybody was telling me how scary it was, but it really was boring.
  6. mackfatsoe

    mackfatsoe Veteran Member

    Joined: Oct 8, 2004 Messages: 6,532 Likes Received: 168
    aww damnit..

    I expected the second movie to be real entertaining.
  7. Dr. Dazzle

    Dr. Dazzle Veteran Member

    Joined: Nov 19, 2001 Messages: 8,147 Likes Received: 3
    I thought the first one was pretty damn gay.....
  8. DREDZ

    DREDZ Senior Member

    Joined: Dec 14, 2002 Messages: 1,934 Likes Received: 0
    one was a'ight...but it was a bit weak...two doesn't look too hot either

    ...the grudge was on the huff tip too...what is it about horror these days?
  9. thebigjvo

    thebigjvo Junior Member

    Joined: Apr 5, 2004 Messages: 186 Likes Received: 0
    FUCK!!!!!!!! i already ordered some tickets online!!!! but the first one was dope as shit to me ohhh well i guess im just gonna have to see it....sequals usualluy suck anyway......
  10. boogie hands

    boogie hands 12oz Legend

    Joined: Feb 15, 2001 Messages: 16,059 Likes Received: 13
    the ring was horrible....they made it twice and it was shitty both times. amazing.

    good thing they made the grudge to prove that...
    a) japanese horror movies are shit
    b) the american remakes are even worse

    when all is said and done i think god owes me 4.5 hours of my life back.....
  11. GnomeToys

    GnomeToys Elite Member

    Joined: Jun 24, 2003 Messages: 2,616 Likes Received: 4
    People order fucking MOVIE TICKETS online now?

  12. caffeine

    caffeine Member

    Joined: Mar 6, 2005 Messages: 503 Likes Received: 0
    Was there a sequel in Japan?

    Anyone seen the Japanese version of the Ring?

    I wanted to know which one is supposebly more scary. People say the Japanese one is.
  13. The Leader

    The Leader Senior Member

    Joined: Jan 23, 2005 Messages: 1,591 Likes Received: 1
    You know what, fuck this movie. I haven't seen it, but I do have an ad in my AIM buddy list box that makes a motherfucking pop up add every time I do anything. Seriously Ring 2, just for your assfaggotry I will not watch you. I mean, I wouldn't have watched you anyway, but now I'm going to make a point of not watching you pretending I have friends that would ask me to go and see you. Fuck you Ring 2, and your fat mother too.
  14. fatcappycap

    fatcappycap Junior Member

    Joined: Jul 18, 2003 Messages: 240 Likes Received: 0
    well i'll be seeing it this week end so if it sucks balls then i'll just leave and go see another movie
  15. Neskoner

    Neskoner New Jack

    Joined: Jan 6, 2003 Messages: 0 Likes Received: 1
    looks just as pointless as the first one..