1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at info@12ozprophet.com and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!

The Great Media Gulp - By William Safire

Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by mental invalid, May 23, 2003.

  1. mental invalid

    mental invalid Dirty Dozen Crew

    Joined:
    May 11, 2001
    Messages:
    13,050

    The Great Media Gulp - By William Safire

    Discussion started by mental invalid - May 23, 2003

    The Great Media Gulp
    By WILLIAM SAFIRE


    WASHINGTON


    The future formation of American public opinion has fallen into the lap of an ambitious 36-year-old lawyer whose name you never heard. On June 2, after deliberations conducted behind closed doors, he will decide the fate of media large and small, print and broadcast. No other decision made in Washington will more directly affect how you will be informed, persuaded and entertained.

    His name is Kevin Martin. He and his wife, Catherine, now Vice President Dick Cheney's public affairs adviser, are the most puissant young "power couple" in the capital. He is one of three Republican members of the five-person Federal Communications Commission, and because he recently broke ranks with his chairman, Michael Powell (Colin's son), on a telecom controversy, this engaging North Carolinian has become the swing vote on the power play that has media moguls salivating.

    The F.C.C. proposal remains officially secret to avoid public comment but was forced into the open by the two commission Democrats. It would end the ban in most cities of cross-ownership of television stations and newspapers, allowing such companies as The New York Times, Washington Post and Chicago Tribune to gobble up ever more electronic outlets. It would permit Viacom, Disney and AOL Time Warner to control TV stations with nearly half the national audience. In the largest cities, it would allow owners of "only" two TV stations to buy a third.

    We've already seen what happened when the F.C.C. allowed the monopolization of local radio: today three companies own half the stations in America, delivering a homogenized product that neglects local news coverage and dictates music sales.

    And the F.C.C. has abdicated enforcement of the "public interest" requirement in issuing licenses. Time was, broadcasters had to regularly reapply and show public-interest programming to earn continuance; now they mail the F.C.C. a postcard every eight years that nobody reads.

    Ah, but aren't viewers and readers now blessed with a whole new world of hot competition through cable and the Internet? That's the shucks-we're-no-monopolists line that Rupert Murdoch will take today in testimony before the pussycats of John McCain's Senate Commerce Committee.

    The answer is no. Many artists, consumers, musicians and journalists know that such protestations of cable and Internet competition by the huge dominators of content and communication are malarkey. The overwhelming amount of news and entertainment comes via broadcast and print. Putting those outlets in fewer and bigger hands profits the few at the cost of the many.

    Does that sound un-conservative? Not to me. The concentration of power — political, corporate, media, cultural — should be anathema to conservatives. The diffusion of power through local control, thereby encouraging individual participation, is the essence of federalism and the greatest expression of democracy.

    Why do we have more channels but fewer real choices today? Because the ownership of our means of communication is shrinking. Moguls glory in amalgamation, but more individuals than they realize resent the loss of local control and community identity.

    We opponents of megamergers and cross-ownership are afflicted with what sociologists call "pluralistic ignorance." Libertarians pop off from what we assume to be the fringes of the left and right wings, but do not yet realize that we outnumber the exponents of the new collectivist efficiency.

    That's why I march uncomfortably alongside CodePink Women for Peace and the National Rifle Association, between liberal Olympia Snowe and conservative Ted Stevens under the banner of "localism, competition and diversity of views." That's why, too, we resent the conflicted refusal of most networks, stations and their putative purchasers to report fully and in prime time on their owners' power grab scheduled for June 2.

    Must broadcasters of news act only on behalf of the powerful broadcast lobby? Are they not obligated, in the long-forgotten "public interest," to call to the attention of viewers and readers the arrogance of a regulatory commission that will not hold extended public hearings on the most controversial decision in its history?

    So much of our lives should not be in the hands of one swing-vote commissioner. Let's debate this out in the open, take polls, get the president on the record and turn up the heat.
     
    mental invalid - Rank: Dirty Dozen Crew - Messages:
    13,050
    - Joined:
    May 11, 2001
  2. grittylifer

    grittylifer Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Messages:
    0

    grittylifer - Replied May 23, 2003

    power couples are wack.
     
    grittylifer - Rank: Banned - Messages:
    0
    - Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
  3. mental invalid

    mental invalid Dirty Dozen Crew

    Joined:
    May 11, 2001
    Messages:
    13,050

    mental invalid - Replied May 23, 2003

    aint that the toof........
     
    mental invalid - Rank: Dirty Dozen Crew - Messages:
    13,050
    - Joined:
    May 11, 2001
  4. !@#$%

    !@#$% Moderator Crew

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2002
    Messages:
    18,516

    !@#$% - Replied May 23, 2003


    politics+desperation=strange bedfellows
     
    !@#$% - Rank: Moderator Crew - Messages:
    18,516
    - Joined:
    Oct 1, 2002
  5. mental invalid

    mental invalid Dirty Dozen Crew

    Joined:
    May 11, 2001
    Messages:
    13,050

    mental invalid - Replied May 23, 2003

    bump......
     
    mental invalid - Rank: Dirty Dozen Crew - Messages:
    13,050
    - Joined:
    May 11, 2001
  6. grittylifer

    grittylifer Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Messages:
    0

    grittylifer - Replied May 23, 2003

    more reason to why i should not own guns.


    shit...ima have dulled plastic silverware and precut food at the rate im going.

    im in such a fucking fowl mood.

    i aint had my correct dosage of medicine in like two weeks.


    kill a motherfucker for thinking at me wrong.


    rah.
     
    grittylifer - Rank: Banned - Messages:
    0
    - Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
  7. grittylifer

    grittylifer Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Messages:
    0

    grittylifer - Replied May 23, 2003

    so if someone bombed all transmission units at once how would america find out till they printed papers.

    man.....i swear this administration is taking the extended slow ride to hell.

    someone needs to send slugs to help them get there faster.

    im so fucking livid right now.

    boo.
     
    grittylifer - Rank: Banned - Messages:
    0
    - Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
  8. BROWNer

    BROWNer Guest

    BROWNer - Replied May 23, 2003

    yep.
     
  9. mental invalid

    mental invalid Dirty Dozen Crew

    Joined:
    May 11, 2001
    Messages:
    13,050

    mental invalid - Replied May 23, 2003

    since becoming chairman of the FCC, he has gone on 44 trips, all paid for by the industry.......


    the most of any government agency.......
     
    mental invalid - Rank: Dirty Dozen Crew - Messages:
    13,050
    - Joined:
    May 11, 2001
  10. TEARZ

    TEARZ Guest

    TEARZ - Replied May 24, 2003

    i've already written my congressmen about the issue, but they're on team bush, so they'll just spit back their normal "although, we don't agree on this issue..."
    whatever happened to respresenting your constituents?

    get ready people, lube up your buttholes for clear channel world...
     
  11. BROWNer

    BROWNer Guest

    BROWNer - Replied May 24, 2003

    i can't believe clear channel has gotten away with some of the
    shit they've pulled in the last 2 years..lube away...
     
  12. Poop Man Bob

    Poop Man Bob Dirty Dozen Crew

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2000
    Messages:
    10,259

    Poop Man Bob - Replied May 24, 2003

    I've contacted both my Senators, and one, although GOP, does agree with me. At least her response said so ...
     
    Poop Man Bob - Rank: Dirty Dozen Crew - Messages:
    10,259
    - Joined:
    Nov 16, 2000
  13. Dick Quickwood

    Dick Quickwood 12oz Loyalist

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2002
    Messages:
    14,783

    Dick Quickwood - Replied May 24, 2003

    clear channel communications owns you
     
    Dick Quickwood - Rank: 12oz Loyalist - Messages:
    14,783
    - Joined:
    Aug 25, 2002
  14. Esai

    Esai 12oz Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2001
    Messages:
    612

    Esai - Replied May 24, 2003

    I just read how some big political watchdog group released a report talking about how the FCC is not objective anymore, and how much large media companies hook these guys up with trips and $$ and other shit. What a democracy huh? I still cant fathom how lobbying is allowed in a democracy, it's just legalized bribing.
     
    Esai - Rank: 12oz Member - Messages:
    612
    - Joined:
    Oct 12, 2001