Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at [email protected] and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!

Supreme Court says B.C. school board wrong to ban same-sex books

Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by Weapon X, Dec 20, 2002.

  1. Weapon X

    Weapon X 12oz Loyalist

    Joined: Sep 6, 2002 Messages: 14,905 Likes Received: 202
    OTTAWA - The Supreme Court of Canada ruled Friday that a British Columbia school board should not have banned books at the kindergarten and Grade 1 level that depicted same-sex parents.

    In a 7-2 ruling, the top court said the school board in Surrey went against provincial legislation that says the public school system is secular and non-sectarian.

    The case goes back to 1997, when the school board refused to approve three books for use in kindergarten and Grade 1.

    The three books are Asha's Mums, Belinda's Bouquet and One Dad, Two Dads, Brown Dads, Blue Dads. The books depicted same-sex parents in a favourable light, triggering complaints from parents who took objection on religious grounds.

    James Chamberlain, a primary-level teacher, wanted to use the books in class, even though they are not part of a reading list approved by the B.C. Education Ministry.

    The Supreme Court ruling focused on the religious objections, rather than the larger issue of gay and lesbian constitutional rights.

    The Surrey board said it ordered the ban because the books were not suitable for five- and six-year olds. The board also said many parents objected to the books because they regard homosexuality as a sin.

    But the court said the moral objections of some parents are not a basis for a ban. The court also concluded "tolerance is always age-appropriate," said John Fisher of the group Equality for Gays and Lesbians Everywhere.

    "The Supreme Court of Canada today ruled that learning about difference actually enhances children's education, that kids benefit when they learn respect for those who are different," he said.

    A trial judge supported Chamberlain in 1998; then the B.C. Court of Appeal reversed the decision in 2000. The appeal court ruled the board could exclude the books from the classroom but have them available in the school library.



    Written by CBC News Online staff
     
  2. EveryWhere

    EveryWhere Senior Member

    Joined: Dec 4, 2002 Messages: 1,128 Likes Received: 0
  3. Kr430n5_666

    Kr430n5_666 Banned

    Joined: Oct 6, 2004 Messages: 19,229 Likes Received: 30
    Unable to save the world
    But able to suffer in this so-called heaven
    Your grotesque vision of pure holyness
    Will be suffocated like you - bearer of light
    Cry bearer of light
    To weak to fight
    Your fear - Your death
    Eye to Eye at Armageddon
     
  4. effyoo

    effyoo Elite Member

    Joined: Sep 2, 2002 Messages: 4,703 Likes Received: 0
    Is the school board Catholic? If so, I could see why the parents were so upset. But if the school board was public the parents shouldn't use the excuse that they think being a homo is a sin.

    "In a 7-2 ruling, the top court said the school board in Surrey went against provincial legislation that says the public school system is secular and non-sectarian"

    Secular- 1. Worldly rather than spiritual.
    2. Not specifically relating to religion or to a religious body

    Sectarian- 1. Of, relating to, or characteristic of a sect.
    2. Adhering or confined to the dogmatic limits of a sect
    or denomination; partisan.
    3. Narrow-minded; parochial.

    Put a "non" in front of this and you get the defn. for non-sectarian.

    So, doesn't this mean that the courts should take the more worldly view and let the teacher use these books?
     
  5. Resurrection

    Resurrection Guest

Top