Ken E. Bus Posted March 28, 2003 Share Posted March 28, 2003 Okay I did a search and while this may have been mentioned no one has really focused on it. Any of you heard about this group. Check out their website. New American Century Really disturbing is the "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report published in 2000. Located here . Here our some of the key findings: ESTABLISH FOUR CORE MISSIONS for U.S. military forces: „Fƒndefend the American homeland; „Fƒnfight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars; „Fƒnperform the ¡§constabulary¡¨ duties associated with shaping the security environment in critical regions; „Fƒntransform U.S. forces to exploit the ¡§revolution in military affairs;¡¨ To carry out these core missions, we need to provide sufficient force and budgetary allocations. In particular, the United States must: MAINTAIN NUCLEAR STRATEGIC SUPERIORITY, basing the U.S. nuclear deterrent upon a global, nuclear net assessment that weighs the full range of current and emerging threats, not merely the U.S.-Russia balance. RESTORE THE PERSONNEL STRENGTH of today¡¦s force to roughly the levels anticipated in the ¡§Base Force¡¨ outlined by the Bush Administration, an increase in active-duty strength from 1.4 million to 1.6 million. REPOSITION U.S. FORCES to respond to 21st century strategic realities by shifting permanently-based forces to Southeast Europe and Southeast Asia, and by changing naval deployment patterns to reflect growing U.S. strategic concerns in East Asia. Rebuilding America¡¦s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century v MODERNIZE CURRENT U.S. FORCES SELECTIVELY, proceeding with the F-22 program while increasing purchases of lift, electronic support and other aircraft; expanding submarine and surface combatant fleets; purchasing Comanche helicopters and medium-weight ground vehicles for the Army, and the V-22 Osprey ¡§tilt-rotor¡¨ aircraft for the Marine Corps. CANCEL ¡§ROADBLOCK¡¨ PROGRAMS such as the Joint Strike Fighter, CVX aircraft carrier, and Crusader howitzer system that would absorb exorbitant amounts of Pentagon funding while providing limited improvements to current capabilities. Savings from these canceled programs should be used to spur the process of military transformation. DEVELOP AND DEPLOY GLOBAL MISSILE DEFENSES to defend the American homeland and American allies, and to provide a secure basis for U.S. power projection around the world. CONTROL THE NEW ¡§INTERNATIONAL COMMONS¡¨ OF SPACE AND ¡§CYBERSPACE,¡¨ and pave the way for the creation of a new military service ¡V U.S. Space Forces ¡V with the mission of space control. EXPLOIT THE ¡§REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS¡¨ to insure the long-term superiority of U.S. conventional forces. Establish a two-stage transformation process which „Fƒnmaximizes the value of current weapons systems through the application of advanced technologies, and, „Fƒnproduces more profound improvements in military capabilities, encourages competition between single services and joint-service experimentation efforts. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING gradually to a minimum level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, adding $15 billion to $20 billion to total defense spending annually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken E. Bus Posted March 29, 2003 Author Share Posted March 29, 2003 Okay so the formatting didn't translate well and I am too lazy to fix it. To all pro-war peoples, explain this site to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest krie Posted March 29, 2003 Share Posted March 29, 2003 shutup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest willy.wonka Posted March 29, 2003 Share Posted March 29, 2003 as long as a few humans survive..im down for the whole world to die Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest krie Posted March 29, 2003 Share Posted March 29, 2003 if me and my girl are in those few, im down with it too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grant_Wood Posted March 29, 2003 Share Posted March 29, 2003 Ken E Bus , whats up with you? you really think I gonna waste my porn/jackoff time to read that shit then reply? fuck that shit, heres a reply without reading it. I think its aight, I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iloveboxcars Posted March 29, 2003 Share Posted March 29, 2003 america: the new romans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest willy.wonka Posted March 29, 2003 Share Posted March 29, 2003 Originally posted by krie if me and my girl are in those few, im down with it too im down to die Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest krie Posted March 29, 2003 Share Posted March 29, 2003 ^^ i tryed last week i cant even succeed in that.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grant_Wood Posted March 29, 2003 Share Posted March 29, 2003 what the fuck are you people talking about? can someone abbreviate wjatever it says up ther in like a sentence or two so I can join the conversation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest krie Posted March 29, 2003 Share Posted March 29, 2003 Mr Wood.. http://www.fatcap.co.uk/host/files/NO.jpg'> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grant_Wood Posted March 29, 2003 Share Posted March 29, 2003 dumbass australians Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken E. Bus Posted March 30, 2003 Author Share Posted March 30, 2003 Basically in 2000 this group of republicans with strong ties to corporate media decided that there needs to be a new world order. That the US had gotten a little soft and we need to beef it up again. The proposed 4 missions for the US. * Defend the American homeland; * Fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars; * Perform the constabulary duties associated with shaping the security environment in critical regions; * Transform U.S. forces to exploit the revolution in military affairs In particular, the United States must: MAINTAIN NUCLEAR STRATEGIC SUPERIORITY RESTORE THE PERSONNEL STRENGTH, an increase in active-duty strength from 1.4 million to 1.6 million. REPOSITION U.S. FORCES to respond to 21st century strategic realities by shifting permanently-based forces to Southeast Europe and Southeast Asia, and by changing naval deployment patterns to reflect growing U.S. strategic concerns in East Asia. MODERNIZE CURRENT U.S. FORCES SELECTIVELY DEVELOP AND DEPLOY GLOBAL MISSILE DEFENSES to defend the American homeland and American allies, and to provide a secure basis for U.S. power projection around the world. CONTROL THE NEW INTERNATIONAL COMMONS OF SPACE AND CYBERSPACE EXPLOIT THE REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kr430n5_666 Posted March 30, 2003 Share Posted March 30, 2003 http://raceworx.com/funnypics/hondasucks.jpg'> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest imported_SecretAgentX9 Posted March 30, 2003 Share Posted March 30, 2003 "Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next." so if they team up with nike or lexus and make this policy all sexy and slick, everyone will want a piece! brilliant. hot damn, all the white people with all the big money really do run this place. earsnot should be the next president elected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.