1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at info@12ozprophet.com and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!

New American Century

Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by Ken E. Bus, Mar 28, 2003.

  1. Ken E. Bus

    Ken E. Bus 12oz Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2002
    Messages:
    311

    New American Century

    Discussion started by Ken E. Bus - Mar 28, 2003

    Okay I did a search and while this may have been mentioned no one has really focused on it. Any of you heard about this group. Check out their website.

    New American Century

    Really disturbing is the "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report published in 2000. Located here .

    Here our some of the key findings:

    ESTABLISH FOUR CORE MISSIONS for U.S. military forces:
    „Fƒndefend the American homeland;
    „Fƒnfight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars;
    „Fƒnperform the ¡§constabulary¡¨ duties associated with shaping the security environment in
    critical regions;
    „Fƒntransform U.S. forces to exploit the ¡§revolution in military affairs;¡¨
    To carry out these core missions, we need to provide sufficient force and budgetary
    allocations. In particular, the United States must:
    MAINTAIN NUCLEAR STRATEGIC SUPERIORITY, basing the U.S. nuclear deterrent upon a
    global, nuclear net assessment that weighs the full range of current and emerging threats,
    not merely the U.S.-Russia balance.
    RESTORE THE PERSONNEL STRENGTH of today¡¦s force to roughly the levels anticipated in
    the ¡§Base Force¡¨ outlined by the Bush Administration, an increase in active-duty strength
    from 1.4 million to 1.6 million.
    REPOSITION U.S. FORCES to respond to 21st century strategic realities by shifting
    permanently-based forces to Southeast Europe and Southeast Asia, and by changing naval
    deployment patterns to reflect growing U.S. strategic concerns in East Asia.
    Rebuilding America¡¦s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century
    v
    MODERNIZE CURRENT U.S. FORCES SELECTIVELY, proceeding with the F-22 program while
    increasing purchases of lift, electronic support and other aircraft; expanding submarine
    and surface combatant fleets; purchasing Comanche helicopters and medium-weight
    ground vehicles for the Army, and the V-22 Osprey ¡§tilt-rotor¡¨ aircraft for the Marine
    Corps.
    CANCEL ¡§ROADBLOCK¡¨ PROGRAMS such as the Joint Strike Fighter, CVX aircraft carrier,
    and Crusader howitzer system that would absorb exorbitant amounts of Pentagon funding
    while providing limited improvements to current capabilities. Savings from these canceled
    programs should be used to spur the process of military transformation.
    DEVELOP AND DEPLOY GLOBAL MISSILE DEFENSES to defend the American homeland and
    American allies, and to provide a secure basis for U.S. power projection around the world.
    CONTROL THE NEW ¡§INTERNATIONAL COMMONS¡¨ OF SPACE AND ¡§CYBERSPACE,¡¨ and pave
    the way for the creation of a new military service ¡V U.S. Space Forces ¡V with the mission of
    space control.
    EXPLOIT THE ¡§REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS¡¨ to insure the long-term superiority of
    U.S. conventional forces. Establish a two-stage transformation process which
    „Fƒnmaximizes the value of current weapons systems through the application of advanced
    technologies, and,
    „Fƒnproduces more profound improvements in military capabilities, encourages competition
    between single services and joint-service experimentation efforts.
    INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING gradually to a minimum level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent of gross
    domestic product, adding $15 billion to $20 billion to total defense spending annually.
     
    Ken E. Bus - Rank: 12oz Member - Messages:
    311
    - Joined:
    May 7, 2002
  2. Ken E. Bus

    Ken E. Bus 12oz Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2002
    Messages:
    311

    Ken E. Bus - Replied Mar 28, 2003

    Okay so the formatting didn't translate well and I am too lazy to fix it.

    To all pro-war peoples, explain this site to me.
     
    Ken E. Bus - Rank: 12oz Member - Messages:
    311
    - Joined:
    May 7, 2002
  3. krie

    krie Guest

    krie - Replied Mar 29, 2003

    shutup
     
  4. willy.wonka

    willy.wonka Guest

    willy.wonka - Replied Mar 29, 2003

    as long as a few humans survive..im down for the whole world to die
     
  5. krie

    krie Guest

    krie - Replied Mar 29, 2003

    if me and my girl are in those few, im down with it too
     
  6. Grant_Wood

    Grant_Wood Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    589

    Grant_Wood - Replied Mar 29, 2003

    Ken E Bus , whats up with you? you really think I gonna waste my porn/jackoff time to read that shit then reply? fuck that shit, heres a reply without reading it.

    I think its aight, I agree.
     
    Grant_Wood - Rank: Banned - Messages:
    589
    - Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
  7. iloveboxcars

    iloveboxcars 12oz Royalty

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    20,499

    iloveboxcars - Replied Mar 29, 2003

    america: the new romans
     
    iloveboxcars - Rank: 12oz Royalty - Messages:
    20,499
    - Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
  8. willy.wonka

    willy.wonka Guest

    willy.wonka - Replied Mar 29, 2003


    im down to die
     
  9. krie

    krie Guest

    krie - Replied Mar 29, 2003

    ^^

    i tryed last week i cant even succeed in that..
     
  10. Grant_Wood

    Grant_Wood Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    589

    Grant_Wood - Replied Mar 29, 2003

    what the fuck are you people talking about? can someone abbreviate wjatever it says up ther in like a sentence or two so I can join the conversation
     
    Grant_Wood - Rank: Banned - Messages:
    589
    - Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
  11. krie

    krie Guest

    krie - Replied Mar 29, 2003

    Mr Wood..

    [​IMG]
     
  12. Grant_Wood

    Grant_Wood Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    589

    Grant_Wood - Replied Mar 29, 2003

    dumbass australians
     
    Grant_Wood - Rank: Banned - Messages:
    589
    - Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
  13. Ken E. Bus

    Ken E. Bus 12oz Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2002
    Messages:
    311

    Ken E. Bus - Replied Mar 30, 2003

    Basically in 2000 this group of republicans with strong ties to corporate media decided that there needs to be a new world order. That the US had gotten a little soft and we need to beef it up again. The proposed 4 missions for the US.

    * Defend the American homeland;
    * Fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars;
    * Perform the constabulary duties associated with shaping the security environment in critical regions;
    * Transform U.S. forces to exploit the revolution in military affairs

    In particular, the United States must:
    MAINTAIN NUCLEAR STRATEGIC SUPERIORITY

    RESTORE THE PERSONNEL STRENGTH, an increase in active-duty strength from 1.4 million to 1.6 million.

    REPOSITION U.S. FORCES to respond to 21st century strategic realities by shifting permanently-based forces to Southeast Europe and Southeast Asia, and by changing naval deployment patterns to reflect growing U.S. strategic concerns in East Asia.

    MODERNIZE CURRENT U.S. FORCES SELECTIVELY

    DEVELOP AND DEPLOY GLOBAL MISSILE DEFENSES to defend the American homeland and American allies, and to provide a secure basis for U.S. power projection around the world.

    CONTROL THE NEW INTERNATIONAL COMMONS OF SPACE AND CYBERSPACE

    EXPLOIT THE REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS

    INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING
     
    Ken E. Bus - Rank: 12oz Member - Messages:
    311
    - Joined:
    May 7, 2002
  14. Kr430n5_666

    Kr430n5_666 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    19,229

    Kr430n5_666 - Replied Mar 30, 2003

    [​IMG]
     
    Kr430n5_666 - Rank: Banned - Messages:
    19,229
    - Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
  15. imported_SecretAgentX9 - Replied Mar 30, 2003

    "Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next."

    so if they team up with nike or lexus and make this policy all sexy and slick, everyone will want a piece! brilliant.

    hot damn, all the white people with all the big money really do run this place. earsnot should be the next president elected.