1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at info@12ozprophet.com and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!

More Halliburton/Bush fun. Hooray!!!!

Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by Esai, May 30, 2003.

  1. Esai

    Esai 12oz Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2001
    Messages:
    612

    More Halliburton/Bush fun. Hooray!!!!

    Discussion started by Esai - May 30, 2003

    Halliburton earns on Iraq-related projects
    Fri May 30,12:16 AM ET

    By Joshua Chaffin in Washington

    Halliburton, the US construction and energy services company, has reaped nearly $500m from Iraq (news - web sites)- related projects in the past two years, well in excess of the amounts previously disclosed, according to a prominent congressional White House critic.




    Representative Henry Waxman, the California Democrat whose office published that figure on Thursday, warned that the company's future revenues in Iraq were "virtually limitless", thanks to an open-ended logistics contract with the US army. Mr Waxman also demanded additional details about that agreement.


    Mr Waxman's remarks and the new contract figures are likely to reignite a controversy surrounding Halliburton's role in rebuilding postwar Iraq.


    The company, which was run by Dick Cheney (news - web sites), vice-president, from 1995-2000, has been dogged by suggestions of favouritism from Mr Waxman and other Democrats.


    Critics have also pointed to past studies showing cost overruns and inflated bills for projects Halliburton carried out in the Balkans on behalf of the US government.


    Halliburton took a stronger line than usual in defending itself on Thursday, pointing out that the company won the original army contract in question - known as Logcap I - in 1992, well before Mr Cheney joined its ranks.


    Halliburton also took issue with any implications of profiteering. "To suggest that either Halliburton or any of the firms that support the Department of Defense (news - web sites) advocate war in order to make money is an affront to all hardworking, honourable Halliburton employees," the company said.


    The controversy is part of a wider debate over the Pentagon (news - web sites)'s increasing use of private companies to handle much of its support work.


    Advocates of the practice claim it saves the government money. But it has also created headaches for companies such as Halliburton that have high-level political connections.


    Halliburton first came under scrutiny in April after Mr Waxman revealed that the Army Corps of Engineers had awarded it a contract worth as much as $7bn - without any competition - to extinguish oil-well fires in Iraq.


    The government defended the closed bidding process, citing national security considerations and the emergency nature of the work, which called for a large and experienced contractor.


    Halliburton also pointed out that it expected to receive far less than the maximum value of the contract because, ultimately, few Iraqi wells were torched. To date, the company has carried out about $71m in work orders.


    But Mr Waxman yesterday noted that Halliburton had garnered about $425m in additional Iraq-related projects through Logcap III, the separate army contract won in December 2001. One of the Iraq projects under Logcap III was assigned nearly a year before the war began.


    The Logcap contracts are open-ended assignments to supply logistical support to the army around the world, including construction of bases and transport of materials.


    "It is simply remarkable that a single company could earn so much money from the war in Iraq," Mr Waxman wrote in a letter yesterday to Les Brownlee, the acting secretary of the army.


    Halliburton said the contract included mechanisms that discouraged any unwarranted spending.


    The army did not immediately return a call on Thursday evening.
     
    Esai - Rank: 12oz Member - Messages:
    612
    - Joined:
    Oct 12, 2001
  2. Kr430n5_666

    Kr430n5_666 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    19,229

    Kr430n5_666 - Replied May 30, 2003

    this is a classic
     
    Kr430n5_666 - Rank: Banned - Messages:
    19,229
    - Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004