By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at [email protected] and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!

Man on the moon? part2

Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by st.nick, Aug 9, 2001.

  1. st.nick

    st.nick Member

    Joined: Dec 26, 2000 Messages: 672 Likes Received: 1
    the only thing that is weird is the stars. the rest is a total stretch.

    i could break it down, but its really not worth it
  2. LUKY

    LUKY Member

    Joined: Sep 22, 2000 Messages: 459 Likes Received: 0
    there are 3 sources of light of the moon, the sun, the EARTH and the stars, the earth is much brighter when its full than a full moon. so there are your 3 sources of light.
  3. brown twinkie

    brown twinkie Veteran Member

    Joined: Jan 6, 2001 Messages: 8,127 Likes Received: 0
    people can argue anything to an almost plausible
    conclusion....whether its right or wrong.
  4. eyeBddub

    eyeBddub Member

    Joined: Jan 14, 2001 Messages: 659 Likes Received: 0
    dude your too paranoid..
    do you honestly think that NASA and the us gov. would be stupid enough to overlook those points when 'faking' a moon landing?

    like they would forget about shit that a 15 year old star trek geek would think to pick out.. they aren't that incompetant
  5. realdeal187

    realdeal187 New Jack

    Joined: Jul 24, 2001 Messages: 92 Likes Received: 0
    the flag was made of steel and it was made to look like it was blowing in the wind just for decrotive purposes
  6. nemersion

    nemersion Junior Member

    Joined: May 10, 2000 Messages: 187 Likes Received: 0
    well, as far as the stars thing.....stars arent picked up on film or photo(unless time exposed) because they dont emit enough visible light. if you take a picture of the starry night, you'll just get a black photo, unless the shutter is opened for an extended period of time.

  7. Trend

    Trend Member

    Joined: Jul 10, 2001 Messages: 611 Likes Received: 0
    but if you look at the flag in the different pictures, it looks different in each one, in respect to the bends and folds and whatnot... i dont know what to think of this whole thing.. i saw the special on TV that covered all of these points, and some of the things said were quite convincing
  8. mental invalid

    mental invalid Dirty Dozen Crew

    Joined: May 11, 2001 Messages: 13,050 Likes Received: 8
    ...have there been any other lunar landings since this one?...r
  9. yoshy

    yoshy Member

    Joined: Jun 23, 2000 Messages: 738 Likes Received: 0
    yo did you check my tag on that shit!!!

    suck me dry and call me dusty

  10. Devilush

    Devilush 12oz Legend

    Joined: Feb 1, 2001 Messages: 17,035 Likes Received: 2
    i've always been skeptical of this so called "phenomenon". it's all a conspiracy.
  11. Ski Mask

    Ski Mask 12oz Loyalist

    Joined: Apr 11, 2000 Messages: 11,114 Likes Received: 209
    for christs sake...how many times do the numerous websites that refute all this "proof" of the consperacy have to be posted before you fucking sheep get it!! 80% of the argument that it was a consperacy is based on the way shadows fall...just get a lamp and a table, cover the table with objects of differing height, then put a cloth/blanket over it. then take identical objects and place them at different places on the blanket...the shadows will cast in all kinds of different directions, with just the one light source. its not that fucking hard to understand...terrain affects the way shadows are cast.

    if any of you think any of that garbage is convincing look at these links to see how unbelievably wrong you are: http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mmoonhoax.html http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html http://www.space.com/news/SI_moon_hoax-1.html http://www.discovery.ca/Templates/webisode...y_id=2001041853 (I caught this one when it aired on TV) http://www.lunaranomalies.com/fake-moon.htm

    ZENYTH.ASP Senior Member

    Joined: Jun 20, 2000 Messages: 1,564 Likes Received: 1

    thoughts and opinions?
  13. Klypse

    Klypse Elite Member

    Joined: Jul 7, 2001 Messages: 2,533 Likes Received: 0
    Damn, not so sure I believe it now.
  14. interesting critique of these photographs... i never would have gone that far to investigate all those points...
  15. and to whoever said that the earth is a source of light... the earth isn't a star.............................................................................. it's a fuggin planet.