st.nick Posted August 9, 2001 Share Posted August 9, 2001 the only thing that is weird is the stars. the rest is a total stretch. i could break it down, but its really not worth it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUKY Posted August 9, 2001 Share Posted August 9, 2001 there are 3 sources of light of the moon, the sun, the EARTH and the stars, the earth is much brighter when its full than a full moon. so there are your 3 sources of light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brown twinkie Posted August 9, 2001 Share Posted August 9, 2001 people can argue anything to an almost plausible conclusion....whether its right or wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeBddub Posted August 9, 2001 Share Posted August 9, 2001 dude your too paranoid.. do you honestly think that NASA and the us gov. would be stupid enough to overlook those points when 'faking' a moon landing? like they would forget about shit that a 15 year old star trek geek would think to pick out.. they aren't that incompetant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
realdeal187 Posted August 9, 2001 Share Posted August 9, 2001 the flag was made of steel and it was made to look like it was blowing in the wind just for decrotive purposes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemersion Posted August 9, 2001 Share Posted August 9, 2001 well, as far as the stars thing.....stars arent picked up on film or photo(unless time exposed) because they dont emit enough visible light. if you take a picture of the starry night, you'll just get a black photo, unless the shutter is opened for an extended period of time. ------------------ poop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trend Posted August 9, 2001 Share Posted August 9, 2001 Originally posted by realdeal187: the flag was made of steel and it was made to look like it was blowing in the wind just for decrotive purposes but if you look at the flag in the different pictures, it looks different in each one, in respect to the bends and folds and whatnot... i dont know what to think of this whole thing.. i saw the special on TV that covered all of these points, and some of the things said were quite convincing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mental invalid Posted August 9, 2001 Share Posted August 9, 2001 ...have there been any other lunar landings since this one?...r Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoshy Posted August 9, 2001 Share Posted August 9, 2001 yo did you check my tag on that shit!!! suck me dry and call me dusty http://yourphotos.com/users/3476/pong.jpg'> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devilush Posted August 9, 2001 Share Posted August 9, 2001 i've always been skeptical of this so called "phenomenon". it's all a conspiracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ski Mask Posted August 9, 2001 Share Posted August 9, 2001 for christs sake...how many times do the numerous websites that refute all this "proof" of the consperacy have to be posted before you fucking sheep get it!! 80% of the argument that it was a consperacy is based on the way shadows fall...just get a lamp and a table, cover the table with objects of differing height, then put a cloth/blanket over it. then take identical objects and place them at different places on the blanket...the shadows will cast in all kinds of different directions, with just the one light source. its not that fucking hard to understand...terrain affects the way shadows are cast. if any of you think any of that garbage is convincing look at these links to see how unbelievably wrong you are: http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mmoonhoax.html http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html http://www.space.com/news/SI_moon_hoax-1.html http://www.discovery.ca/Templates/webisode...y_id=2001041853 (I caught this one when it aired on TV) http://www.lunaranomalies.com/fake-moon.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZENYTH.ASP Posted August 10, 2001 Share Posted August 10, 2001 http://www.yourphotos.com/users/3697/manonthemoon.jpg'> thoughts and opinions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klypse Posted August 10, 2001 Share Posted August 10, 2001 Damn, not so sure I believe it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest imported_SecretAgentX9 Posted August 10, 2001 Share Posted August 10, 2001 interesting critique of these photographs... i never would have gone that far to investigate all those points... hmmmmmmmm.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rules for mules Posted August 10, 2001 Share Posted August 10, 2001 and to whoever said that the earth is a source of light... the earth isn't a star.............................................................................. it's a fuggin planet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaesthebluntedwonder Posted August 10, 2001 Share Posted August 10, 2001 so they skydived off a plane to make people think they were comming from outter space...wait, didn't they drop down in that little metal shuttle? ...so a big b 52 bomber took it up and dropped that and then they pretended like they couldn't use their muscles afterwards too, since that's what being on the moon would have done sheesh, gimme a break and, is the moon a star? huh wiseass? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest young republican Posted August 10, 2001 Share Posted August 10, 2001 Originally posted by rules for mules: and to whoever said that the earth is a source of light... the earth isn't a star.............................................................................. it's a fuggin planet. you arent too bright a source of light their yourself... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ammo Posted August 10, 2001 Share Posted August 10, 2001 I KNEW IT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.