By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at [email protected] and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!

legal help

Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by some pittsburgh flavor, May 13, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. some pittsburgh flavor

    some pittsburgh flavor Elite Member

    Joined: Mar 31, 2001 Messages: 4,936 Likes Received: 0
    rite aid thought i was trying to steal things. apparently when you "conceal" merchandise, in this case, under a sweatshirt, it is shoplifting. today i recieved two papers in the mail. one was a copy of the theft external theft incident report filled out at the store, the other was a Pennsylvania Civil Demand Notification.

    on the external theft incident report, section G, the "civil law issued: yes___ no___" section, "no" was checked. what does this mean? are they not pressing charges? the police and the store manager both said i'm never allowed in the store again or it's a violation of tresspass laws and such, and then they would have to press charges and i'd go to court. why would they send me a copy of the civil demand notification if they were not charging me with anything? the law says if i'm charged and if they want to persue it, i ahve to pay back $2.99 plus $150. i'm poor as dirt.

    does anyone have any idea about this, it would be greatly appreciated.

    i wasn't even going to steal anything.
  2. !@#$%

    [email protected]#$% Moderator Crew

    Joined: Oct 1, 2002 Messages: 18,517 Likes Received: 623
    looks like no, they aren't pressing charges

    if oyu havent gotten court documents, they arent

    maybe because the value of the merch concealed was so small?
  3. some pittsburgh flavor

    some pittsburgh flavor Elite Member

    Joined: Mar 31, 2001 Messages: 4,936 Likes Received: 0
    like i said, i wasn't trying to steal anything. although Russell thought i had intent to.
  4. oldenglish

    oldenglish Banned

    Joined: Apr 3, 2003 Messages: 1,308 Likes Received: 0
    you basically got off. they know who you are a and where you live and if they wanted to they could press charges with the documentation they sent you and charge however court costs for the allegged theft of a 2.99 bottle of some shit or whaterver would be like around a grand plus if you took it to trial and you could probably have a good chance of being found innocent. but they know you did it so as long as you dont trespass and get caught your all good.


    my homey bought me a six pack.
  5. Please do not discuss theft on 12oz.

    Thank you and good luck.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.