By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at [email protected] and we'll help you recover your account.

Bush justifies war costs

Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by ClueTwo, Sep 7, 2003.

  1. ClueTwo

    ClueTwo Veteran Member

    Joined: Nov 30, 2001 Messages: 9,030 Likes Received: 123
    Bush makes case for spending billions in Iraq
    Sunday, September 7, 2003 Posted: 8:56 PM EDT (0056 GMT)

    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush told Americans in a televised address Sunday night that he will seek an additional $87 billion to continue the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    "This will take time and require sacrifice. Yet we will do whatever is necessary -- we will spend whatever is necessary -- to achieve this essential victory in the war on terror, to promote freedom, and to make our own nation more secure," Bush said.

    A congressional source said Bush's request is based on assumptions that the cost of military operations in Iraq alone will exceed $4 billion a month for at least the next year.

    Billions more will be used for the reconstruction effort, which the White House at one point said would be largely paid for through the sales of Iraqi oil.

    The United States will seek additional international support to rebuild Iraq and will restore self-rule there, Bush said in the 8:30 p.m. EDT speech.

    Iraq is now occupied by a U.S.-led coalition.

    Before the speech, several prominent Democrats expressed skepticism about Bush's Iraq policy.

    House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt, a candidate for his party's nomination, was among them.

    "The problem now is the president did his photo op -- he landed on the aircraft carrier, declared the war was over -- but he's never had a plan, and he's never gotten us the help that we need and our troops deserve from other countries," Gephhardt said.

    More U.S. soldiers have been killed in Iraq since May 1, when Bush declared an end to major combat there, than were killed during the invasion, in part because of an ongoing guerrilla campaign against coalition troops.

    A string of car bombings last month killed more than 100 people, including a leading Shiite Muslim cleric and the U.N. special representative for Iraq. (Interactive: Coalition casualties)

    The administration has asked the United Nations to help it establish a new Iraqi government and to authorize a U.S.-led multinational force for Iraq in hopes that it will prompt other countries to contribute troops to stabilize the country.

    Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, said he was not sure the proposed U.N. resolution would address the immediate problems in Iraq.

    "It's the United States' war. We're the ones that started it. It's our responsibility to finish it," McCain told CBS. "We need more troops. We need more money. We need it quickly, and time is not on our side."
  2. villain

    villain Veteran Member

    Joined: Jul 12, 2002 Messages: 5,190 Likes Received: 2
    I'm not going to type a dossier on all the stategic failures of the war but there are some really glaring faults.
    -Destruction of key infrastructure contributing to instability.
    -Gradual loss of popular support fueling guerilla warfare.
    -Failure to establish a national police force in a better position to root out rebellion.
    Basically we are in a dying country performing riot control duties.
  3. metallix

    metallix Elite Member

    Joined: Oct 7, 2001 Messages: 2,955 Likes Received: 1
    Sabotaged pipelines = No Oil!

    Tease do you want to start armageddon?
  4. villain

    villain Veteran Member

    Joined: Jul 12, 2002 Messages: 5,190 Likes Received: 2
    Tease you just can't go around A-bombing people these days. Sympathizers would bomb the shit out of us too. That's the very reason why the cold war ended. Due to assurance of "mutual destruction" the cold war degenerated to an arms race and countervieling threats. It eventually drove the Soviet Union to bankruptcy and caused it's collapse because it did not emphasize it's own profit generating businesses. This may actually happen in the U.S. with Bush's ambitious agenda. Unemployment is up and up, mutual funds are falling, mortgage rates are skyrocketing.
    Thank god Nixon didn't A-bomb vietnam. That fucking bigot.
  5. ClueTwo

    ClueTwo Veteran Member

    Joined: Nov 30, 2001 Messages: 9,030 Likes Received: 123
    :confused: What the hell are you talking about?
  6. BigOatser

    BigOatser Senior Member

    Joined: Jan 7, 2003 Messages: 2,097 Likes Received: 0
  7. $360

    $360 Elite Member

    Joined: Oct 2, 2002 Messages: 2,600 Likes Received: 1
    there was a really great comic in rilling stone about a year ago i think...

    its a comic called "get youre war on" and it had people being like

    "oh man, this war on terror is going to be awesome. just like the war on drugs in the 80's, remember how well that worked out?"

    anyone have this comic?i would love to see it