By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

  1. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum...
    You are currently logged out and viewing our forum as a guest which only allows limited access to our discussions, photos and other forum features. If you are a 12ozProphet Member please login to get the full experience.

    If you are not a 12ozProphet Member, please take a moment to register to gain full access to our website and all of its features. As a 12ozProphet Member you will be able to post comments, start discussions, communicate privately with other members and access members-only content. Registration is fast, simple and free, so join today and be a part of the largest and longest running Graffiti, Art, Style & Culture forum online.

    Please note, if you are a 12ozProphet Member and are locked out of your account, you can recover your account using the 'lost password' link in the login form. If you no longer have access to the email you registered with, please email us at [email protected] and we'll help you recover your account. Welcome to the 12ozProphet Forum (and don't forget to follow @12ozprophet in Instagram)!


Discussion in 'Channel Zero' started by imported_Tesseract, Sep 30, 2003.

  1. http://www.play-off.it/adidas.jpg'>


    Personally i hate the new adidas logo...
    You take the best corporate design ever,
    The three stripes that fit everywhere dopely
    and make the worst logo you can with it...
    Its unbelievable
  2. crave

    crave Veteran Member

    Joined: Jan 20, 2002 Messages: 6,728 Likes Received: 10
    the new logo design really doesn't hold up to the old school one but it'll change again.
  3. se_FOUR

    se_FOUR Senior Member

    Joined: Aug 27, 2002 Messages: 1,796 Likes Received: 1
    No question *Old Skool*
  4. Nic Thamaire

    Nic Thamaire Elite Member

    Joined: Apr 20, 2000 Messages: 2,921 Likes Received: 9
  5. mr.yuck

    mr.yuck Veteran Member

    Joined: May 12, 2000 Messages: 6,952 Likes Received: 6
    The oldschool logo is nice. The new one's stink. But then again im really diggin a lot of new adidas shoes. But that wasn't even the question was it?
  6. PedroHammers

    PedroHammers Dirty Dozen Crew

    Joined: May 24, 2003 Messages: 403 Likes Received: 0
    down with capitalism
  7. Telo

    Telo Elite Member

    Joined: Jun 3, 2003 Messages: 4,164 Likes Received: 37
    doesnt matter.. they are just shoes.
  8. Telo

    Telo Elite Member

    Joined: Jun 3, 2003 Messages: 4,164 Likes Received: 37
    sorry .. i meant, they are just shoes,hats,shirts,watches,pants,swimming gear,basketball gear, soccer gear, tennis gear,pologear and much much more... corporate bastards
  9. yoink

    yoink Elite Member

    Joined: May 27, 2002 Messages: 3,428 Likes Received: 0
    I hate how the old school logo is trendy now, with all the retro bullshit, but as far as symbol wise, old school fo sheezy.

    the new symbol looks pretty much shitty in every aspect.
  10. Caution: Patented NerdRamble™ critique follows...

    First of all, I want to state that I like the old logo much much more for personal taste reasons. However, in terms of good logo design, I'm not sure if the old one is definitely superior, except in the category of lasting impression (probably the most important) and standbyitselfability. More on this later.

    Now by relying on my total lack of expertise in logo design, I must say the new logo isn't bad. It integrates better with text (though not the specific typeface used by Adidas, too curvy), and by placing the lines at an angle gives the brand a dynamic look that more appropiately represents the direction the company has taken in the past few years. Their positioning is also concordant with the actual position of the three lines on their footwear (their most important item), and just seeing the logo reminds you of what their product looks like. It does a much better job of integrating brand with product than the old one. Not to mention the hidden message of "reach your peak" implied with the overall shape.

    The old logo is a stronger, lasting, and more unique image, but the aesthetic is gentle and, if being seen for the first time, does not particularly bring to mind the concept of athleticism. I'm unsure of what it is... A crown? A flame? A lotus? It's not abstract or simple enough (as in the new logo) for me to not care what it is. It matches the rounded typeface much better, but other than the curvy look and equal line/letter thickness there's no formal relationship between the two... in the new logo, the length of the text fits perfectly as the footer, rounding out the pyramid shape with a wide base. However, the old logo doesn't even NEED the type to work (standbyitselfability), whereas the new one looks awkward without it.

    In conclusion, the old logo wins because it looks way fucking cooler. But in terms of logo design I think they're pretty much even... but I'm giving the victory to the new one. I could easily visualize how a kid, with no former knowledge of what Adidas is or what it stood for in the past, would respond more to the new logo than the old.
  11. Telo

    Telo Elite Member

    Joined: Jun 3, 2003 Messages: 4,164 Likes Received: 37
    hmmmmm.. with that said.. i started to think.

    i think the old one kind of illustrates the fact that the whole leafy effect relates to soccer and grassy outdoor sports...

    in the new times, adidas has spread itself to sooooo many other sports (and recreational activities). The whole mountain effect kind of gives it the ENTIRE outdoor kickass "we can do anything with these shoes" type of feel to it.

    just my opinion.
  12. caL

    caL Senior Member

    Joined: Feb 7, 2003 Messages: 2,056 Likes Received: 0
    last time i thought of triangles as mountains was in elementery school
    i dont like the new one either, but i dont care.
    sambas are still cool
  13. Caution: Patented NerdReply™ follows...

    Valid point there Mams, i dont disagree at all...and i'm sure all these thoughts lead to changing the logo...the pyramid/gradual/highpeak comment is hot. However, i'm thinking of two or three things.

    A. Adidas is probably the oldest 'brand' of athletic shoes...the 3 stripes 'logo' was already exteremely famous and associated with
    superior athletic products...During the Moscow Olympics, right in the
    high peak of the cold war..over 80% of the athletes BOTH eastern and western block rocked adidas shoes for better results...thats pretty important to me as just how successfull and known they were.
    Were do i wanna go?...the proper strategy for me in cases like that..is to hold tight what you earned...focus your campaigns on new products worthy of the 'legacy' (quality,fucntion,innovation) and play your 'history' card at the same time. In order for that to happen you just dont change an already succesfull and universally known logo.

    B. Adidas always had a logo, its not the old one or the new....its the 3 stripes concept in general...shoes, sweatpants,hoodies..everything they ever made uses it in its original form...you can find so many associations and parallelisms in the number 3 its ridiculous. It seems to me that they had what they needed from day one...adidas needs a 'logo' for paperwork issues rather than product usage.

    C. The marriage of the old font with the new logo (as you underlined) is a failure. I thought nike was very smart when they wiped out the word nike out of their logo...they realised all they need is a symbol since everyone knows the name.

    END. I'm not against changing their logo...i just feel that given their history and the three stripes thing in general they could come with something doper and more elegant that what they did, its the most obvious and dull logo they could have. The reason i like the old one better [its a trio-leaf i think that loosely associates with another old and dope brands logo (the award for the winners of the ancient greek olympic games)] is that the new one looks ugly everywhere i've seen on products...i'e never seen a shoe, pants, hoody with the new logo looking good on it...in reverse with the old one that always looked superfresh everywhere.

    PS. to bring another issue on the table, my feeling on 'modern' logos is that advertisers, designers and ofcourse custumers pushed logos into a more 'agressive' look that may serve to draw attention and remain in mind but it ussually seriously lacks class and dope function when embedded to products.
  14. SteveAustin

    SteveAustin Veteran Member

    Joined: Mar 12, 2002 Messages: 7,042 Likes Received: 2
    excellent critique mamerro...all that shit went through my head.

    I think the leaf design of the original was inspired by the olive branch from the olympics....thus being multi-sport.